.
It has been suggested before and put up for review.
On 3/20/2017 at 0:02 PM, ORCA1911 said:
It has been suggested before and put up for review.
Any info on how the review is progressing?
LOL ^^
Edited cause it was salty. But still **** nasa lol
34 minutes ago, xXConflictionXx said:
Also lower the amount of people that a corp can have to 150; Nasa is out of hand.
One corp is more than just dominating the entire game, they are the fukn rulers of the game. I don’t much care for some nerdy kids with broken ships lording over me.
Who cares about NASA? Sure they USED to be cool, but now they’re a bunch of try-hard losers who suck at everything.
Strangely enough, the changeover happened as soon as I left. 
43 minutes ago, JasanQuinn said:
Who cares about NASA? Sure they USED to be cool, but now they’re a bunch of try-hard losers who suck at everything.
Strangely enough, the changeover happened as soon as I left. 
On 04/06/2017 at 7:34 PM, xKostyan said:
despite how much i hate being trolled in OS by people in NASA (return crystal of course), this response is far too true
I really hope they find something for it as TheStig suggested… I’m getting tired from unbalanced battle nearly on every battle we play  that doesn’t motivate us at all for playing dreads and it will cause more and more pilots to hate dread battles…
and Also see this is biggest joke ever… Alone vs A Whole Corp. How the developers call it balanced … god 
55 minutes ago, CommandosGrozny said:
How the developers call it balanced … god 
What did you expect? a 1v1?
Devs never called it balanced, because the game mode was never aimed to be that. It is a Corporate warfare, where CORPORATES fight. Did you expect devs to split enemy wing in half and give you half of it or something?
I get where people are coming from with mixed tiers, and I agree for the most part. But your example has nothing to do with this.
I’m not sure why people fault NASA for doing what they are doing.
The game population is drying up so they start grabbing the good/better/best players.
The corp now has a full roster of good or better players.
The corp now has the capability to win games.
Did you expect them not to act in their own best interest?
3 hours ago, Elusif said:
Did you expect them not to act in their own best interest?
What are you, a representative for nasa? They are capable of fighting their own battles and the t3 vs t5 thing, wtf does that have to do with them.
People will find ways to have the advantage just like when in OS and see a slow frigate just about to reach the gate to go to the next sector and warp him back to the start a few times with tai’kin or people warping slow ships into outter map and not enough time to get back.
The problem to begin with is that they are there to be taken advantage of in the first place and those are the things that should be rethought.
WARNING: If I see anyone AFK farming in OS I will warp you to the start for everyone to see you and if I could put a dunce hat on you I would so we can all get a good laugh at the AFK’er. ahahah
I’m a representative of common sense. Why would anyone, given the option, choose to not join the people that are winning? This isn’t a movie this is reality, you should make the move that has the greatest benefit.
3 hours ago, Elusif said:
I’m not sure why people fault NASA for bribing who they are bribing.
The game population is drying up so they start bribing the [faith] to join them players.
The corp now has a full roster of stolen [faith] players.
I agree, thumbs up to them
17 minutes ago, evo888 said:
I agree, thumbs up to them
This revelation may put you in a deep state of shock, so proceed with caution:
Spoiler
They came to us.
Heh, trying to score points with nasa?
21 minutes ago, evo888 said:
Bribery
You are not entitled to the players within your corporation. If they leave for something better who are you to chastise them? If you are working at a job in the real world, and another company makes you a better offer, why would you turn it down? Did the pilots swear a blood oath of loyalty to the corporation?
What the people who are mad are implying here is that the system is rigged against them, that their smaller corps can’t possibly do anything to stop NASA. So the solution is to have everyone stand around complaining about it endlessly? If we all cry loudly enough, grandpa stalin will descend from the heavens in his t-34 and deliver us from this godforsaken wasteland!
Maybe playing EVE for long enough gives you the perspective needed for this issue, but the solution to all of the power being concentrated into one corporation isn’t crying about it. The solution is to have those that are left concentrate into a singular group.
Then again EVE had a relatively healthy player base, and the largest organisations were exceedingly prone to splitting up due to internal issues.
The question is of course, whether there are enough people outside of NASA that if they worked together or even did something so bold as to form under a single corporation, would they even be able to make a difference?
6 minutes ago, xXConflictionXx said:
Heh, trying to score points with nasa?
I am tired of people acting like children.
3 minutes ago, Elusif said:
I am tired of people acting like children.
Uhm, ok?
2 hours ago, evo888 said:
I agree, thumbs up to them
That’s going a bit too far, but i somewhat agree.
Seems like we are just baby’s first corporation for some.
And for the main topic, yes,it should be balanced quickly, to avoid (maybe unvolontary) abuses of already powerful corporations.
.