Developer Error explain to me what is the purpose of the new system simply spoils to spoil the joy of the player? Today I met lots 10 military and 4 experimental and 4 that this experimental everyone I break even by paying gold extraction, min for this new system is totally a waste of time even worse than PvE server to gain some military items are all naturally thinking which is the purpose of this … Wanted to know the camera is now a problem for the frigates being that it occupies half the screen the only thing good in this update was the improvement in speed and inteceptors modules combat frigate and is now doing their part to assist the team which is in line brings supporting or fighting from a safe distance that only two things were coming along the rest is Pecimo
The obvious point is to tease you with those items, and if you want increased chance of grabbing them, you spend gold.
It’s a lottery system. Low chance for free, medium chance for gold.
Whee. Found another ninja change. My phase remodulator hugely nerfs my energy regeneration while active. I guess recons needed a nerf.
Phase remodulator sucks a lot of energy per each second of use. It always did. Are you sure it’s not that?
If you played it in 0.8.0, you may have gotten used to the fact that you’re often flying without afterburners, which burn almost as much energy as your ship regenerates, and now when you enter cloak with afterburners on, it’s huge drain just like it was in 0.7.x.
The obvious point is to tease you with those items, and if you want increased chance of grabbing them, you spend gold.
It’s a lottery system. Low chance for free, medium chance for gold.
Luckyo extraction system of estates may be even more promising was poorly implemented guess if you’re paying for a gold extraction in the chance to get up to 60% and if you’re paying extraction creditos should rise to 30% over currently extraction credits is 10% which you get the chance it will drop any iten and gold extraction by the same thing even if it is more than 1/4 the iten break … Our had been happy when my eyes fell on a cannon ballistics (the one that the greater damage to the hull than shield) T1 experimental 310 damage put paying for extracting gold and items simply break and not once was there were 5 times on different items … So practically became more dificultoso you win or experimental military items currently almost impossible … I see the PvE a way to get more military items that they are breaking up
Luckyo extraction system of estates may be even more promising was poorly implemented guess if you’re paying for a gold extraction in the chance to get up to 60% and if you’re paying extraction creditos should rise to 30% over currently extraction credits is 10% which you get the chance it will drop any iten and gold extraction by the same thing even if it is more than 1/4 the iten break … Our had been happy when my eyes fell on a cannon ballistics (the one that the greater damage to the hull than shield) T1 experimental 310 damage put paying for extracting gold and items simply break and not once was there were 5 times on different items … So practically became more dificultoso you win or experimental military items currently almost impossible … I see the PvE a way to get more military items that they are breaking up
I’d say non-pay 30% pay 50%, or non-pay 40% pay 60%, 10% is a huge dissapointment and is basicly n insta-break, always.
I looked at their stats and they have not changed. Don’t lie >:(
I never had the slightest problem afterburning around for my full phase remod duration before, now I’m out of energy pretty much as soon as I switch it on, and I haven’t refitted my ship. I’ve been playing my Dwarf 2 pretty much every evening for the past week. *something* has changed on it to do with energy.
I never had the slightest problem afterburning around for my full phase remod duration before, now I’m out of energy pretty much as soon as I switch it on, and I haven’t refitted my ship. I’ve been playing my Dwarf 2 pretty much every evening for the past week. *something* has changed on it to do with energy.
What changed is most likely the fact that you weren’t actually afterburning - propulsion suppressor disabled afterburner and they were EVERYWHERE in 0.8.0.
And now, they are very rare + new map is huge and you can’t suppress all important point with just a couple of guard frigates.
Luckyo extraction system of estates may be even more promising was poorly implemented guess if you’re paying for a gold extraction in the chance to get up to 60% and if you’re paying extraction creditos should rise to 30% over currently extraction credits is 10% which you get the chance it will drop any iten and gold extraction by the same thing even if it is more than 1/4 the iten break … Our had been happy when my eyes fell on a cannon ballistics (the one that the greater damage to the hull than shield) T1 experimental 310 damage put paying for extracting gold and items simply break and not once was there were 5 times on different items … So practically became more dificultoso you win or experimental military items currently almost impossible … I see the PvE a way to get more military items that they are breaking up
I understand the problem. As I mentioned earlier in the thread, this is the korean system - pay real money for in-game lottery that lets you sometimes win awesome prizes. It’s very much culturally acceptable in the East, and much less so here in the West.
I still think that if that’s the way they want to take monetization to, it’s fine by me. I’ll just always use 10% and treat is as another randomizer. I’m an old WoW player and used to the double-roll system where first the item I want needs to drop, and then I I have to roll for it against up to 10/25 other players. But that’s just my opinion on it. I’m merely against the claim that “everyone” is against it - clearly this is not the case. Poster on top of this page “FunkyBacon” for example thinks that system is fine, it’s just that numbers are a bit off.
Oh and JPHack - I think we’ll have to call off that duel. They buffed ints enough for me to start playing them again, and I think covert ops with rapid fire rails/rapid fire plasma is actually the new OP. The fact that they nerfed speeds of gunships isn’t encouraging either (my wolf-M lost about 70m/s on engine overdrive for some reason in this patch).
On that note, can you actually play the game on three monitors with wider-then-normal FoV? Because that would be quite overpowered with the new camera and narrow FoV.
I agree with you the system can behold another interesting way to create rooms combat between friend and companion alert by payment in gold that would be an interesting form, the more I talk and I repeat do not like the new system of plunder and even the new camera ( although she has not given headache that game only with interceptors then it makes much difference the camera)
I understand the problem. As I mentioned earlier in the thread, this is the korean system - pay real money for in-game lottery that lets you sometimes win awesome prizes. It’s very much culturally acceptable in the East, and much less so here in the West.
I still think that if that’s the way they want to take monetization to, it’s fine by me. I’ll just always use 10% and treat is as another randomizer. I’m an old WoW player and used to the double-roll system where first the item I want needs to drop, and then I I have to roll for it against up to 10/25 other players. But that’s just my opinion on it. I’m merely against the claim that “everyone” is against it - clearly this is not the case. Poster on top of this page “FunkyBacon” for example thinks that system is fine, it’s just that numbers are a bit off.
Oh and JPHack - I think we’ll have to call off that duel. They buffed ints enough for me to start playing them again, and I think covert ops with rapid fire rails/rapid fire plasma is actually the new OP. The fact that they nerfed speeds of gunships isn’t encouraging either (my wolf-M lost about 70m/s on engine overdrive for some reason in this patch).
On that note, can you actually play the game on three monitors with wider-then-normal FoV? Because that would be quite overpowered with the new camera and narrow FoV.
hohoho, I have to stop you there…
I do not agree with the system, but seeing how these devs don’t revert back to old systems(Which was better in several cases(Not only loot), it just needed to drop slightly more items) I figured I might as well tell them that the current rates are WAY too low to be fun.
As you might have seen me post elsewhere, I have been hating on this game since 8.0 and getting annoyed since 7.10.
Yes It is making the game not worth playing you get into battle and crash and I never got the 1 day premium they promised
3 Greens 2 purple all failed had a score of 3200 all on the 10% chance oh wairt here have credits instead of gearing your ship smart idea imo 200 gold for 30% thats a joke right?
If I was in charge of this I probably would log in and see everyone going crazy over the loot and crashes but I guess us paying customers come last as usual
God damn it! Please, please, please give us back the decent camera! I can’t stand flying Frigates with the camera shoved right up their arse!
The Camera is horrible on the hydra come on guys can you please fix the crash’s the Camera and the loot system
these issues are the biggest problem with this patch, you guys said a while back there would be no first person cockpits because it limits your feild of view to much, with frigates i can barley see past my ship, its always in the way, the new camera system is excactly what you guys said you woudnt do, its borderline FPS compared to what it was before the patch, now my frigates are next to useless due to the xxxx camera angle, i cant see half of the ships around me, also the game need serious optimization, it ran great before the patch now its laggy and jumpy. another thing is the engi frigate, if your going to make us buy the same ship 3 times then at least give us the turrets that you removed. they are the only reason i bought the ship when i did, i feel like i bought something and then it got nerfed, dont be like SOE and planetside 2, give us the turrets back
I do not agree with the system, but seeing how these devs don’t revert back to old systems(Which was better in several cases(Not only loot), it just needed to drop slightly more items) I figured I might as well tell them that the current rates are WAY too low to be fun.
As you might have seen me post elsewhere, I have been hating on this game since 8.0 and getting annoyed since 7.10.
Join the club. I’m a card holding member of “everything past the contract nerf has been a downhill path” club. This patch imho was the first one since those times where pros and cons appear to be somewhat in balance. I.e. there’s a lot of bad still in, but there’s also a lot of good stuff like return of the interceptors.
It’s happened - I lost my first Experimental piece of loot, and the feelings of injustice were immense. It does not make me want to keep playing this game.
I lost 3 or 5 or so today. Didn’t give a damn. Experienced WoW player here, used to not getting the loot I want after seeing it :salute:
They are giving us the price of the sale of the module. Remember that you sell modules for ~10% of their purchase price in the shop. You can test this in warehouse.
They are giving us the price of the sale of the module. Remember that you sell modules for ~10% of their purchase price in the shop. You can test this in warehouse.
No, they not giving the sell price, Just look the pics below
What would be good is a version of Star Conflict where we can play around with settings etc on our computer without connecting to the servers. This way, we can all make and forward things we would like to see in-game to the devs and allow them to debate on it. That way, we get things that we want.
And for Pete’s sake, putting up a poll about the next update wouldn’t hurt! If I knew what was in the next patch and didn’t like it, instead of writing an email I can just vote NO.
