~Ruining my Post count even more~
I can’t believe what I am reading from you here time and time again…You say the system is good?
How can T1 put up a challenge against T2, let alone T3?
How can T2 put up a challenge against T3, let alone T4?
The ship slots, modules availability and implants make a HUGE difference.
Maybe we should do an event…Dev T1 team vs NASA T2 team…I’m sure the dev team can totally win!
While i am not agreeing or disagree on whole matchmaking debate here, i kindly ignore it, this particular post is one of the core problems with the community, you take stuff up from thin air and then go around shouting it at everyone.
This is NOT how matchmaking work nor suppose to work, it doesn’t match you with best of the best of higher tiers - they are already pushed up by tier so you are matched with low of the lowest in higher tier. And thank you for comparing NASA as low of the lowest, i personally think better of myself.
I absolutely agree that new players should not fight new players in higher tiers just because they are in squad, average team work of such a squad is equal or below of random pug.
But skilled players can compete in higher tiers, as an example we were doing 4x man T1 NASA squad, leveling ships, we were put against r6s most of the time, result? 90% win rate, we even won Capture the beacon vs T3 3x man squad back then.
Last night I was solo leveling my r3 ships, obviously i had mk3 gear on them, i was put in the queue 24 and was matched against r4-6s, all games were 12v12 and i did not see a single T3 ship during those games. Result? about 10 Pms with claims that i am cheater, Aim-bot user and some other rage messages.