AGREE
So If you two have adventage over enemy team you won’t use it because it’s not fair to enemies?
ESB, NOVA etc can be counter with other squad. Not with randoms but come on… randoms almost always play worse than bots 
You took it a little to far with paraphrasing what I said, but:
1.) I wouldn’t necessarily call gamers “enemies” - rather “opponents”.
2.) It’s a matter of fair play, where does it stop and where does deliberate “seal clubbing” start? In my experience many of these squads are a little to “clueless” about such matters to transmit that message of playing for fun and playing fair. It also doesn’t help that most of the time these guys ~20 year olds…
3.) Please note that I refrain from naming any teams or people, but I wouldn’t if I noticed any in Star conflict. I’m more theorising about a common problem which is represented in gaming since 2000.
I can agree on the imbalance of the teams. This comes back to the old discussion of whether to cater to the pugs or let the coodinated squads decide matches.
However, what I said above are not opinion. You can’t counter a 4man squad by yourself. You need an equally good squad of your own. Calling them exploiters is basically you QQing about you being not able to take them 1v4.
Don’t you think that catering to pugs or letting teams decide are two extremes? I find myself constantly between this hammer and anvil, and TBH I’m fed up.
“Exploiters” would imply an intent to win dirty. I think it’s too far fetched.
Sorry but I don’t agree. Squads should always be a deciding factor in a game with classes, roles and teamplay.
As I always say, if you want to be the solo hero, play Starcraft 2.
And if he doesn’t like SC2, then quit gaming or what, lol? :)))