21 hours ago, xKostyan said:
I don’t see star conflict as progression game at all
i think you misunderstood me. i meant with “single progression” how they also called elite in the press, as opposed to an item economy, where you can just give others your stuff.
meaning, all you gather is basicly just unlocks, that you can (almost) not share.
like e.g. elite opposed to eve.
also, i do have to say to both of you, “no progression” is certainly a bit overstated. there is indeed an unlock progression in the game, quite a considerable one. it is certainly not on the low ranks of grindyness, i would put it somewhere between gtaV and elite…
don’t forget that we are in this game since the start, and have played an overly big amount of time, and invested a little sum, besides the goodies we got. it is easy to overlook the progression from our viewpoint. and also with the current meta, having no craftable ships or golden ships puts you certainly at a disadvantage in choices.
of course, it should not matter, fun should be the game and goal of the game should not be progression. but that is the ideal, not the reality.
6 hours ago, xKostyan said:
You don’t need to hit the limit to purchase anything, there are plenty of small priced resource sinks, and if a player has nothing to sink their resources on, in no way that player is a new player.
the point of “single progression” is, because your money (may it be credits, monos, items, or green, pink and blue crystals) can’t be given to others, it does not matter how much you actually have. if you have 15 billion, why not have that much? why put a cap so low, that it actually is feelable? how is a mailbox full of items you won’t get enticing?
this is the difference between good and bad design. one that feels like a punishment, and one that gives you an incentive.
and yet again i agree with ownagepas that such a sight is just bad.
even if i also agree with you, that it is not everyone’s biggest issue i guess.
–…–
now one could say “but they plan to make it more economic, and make the market better and it will be great”
well, then i can only answer.
1. do it all at once. revamp the economy and go from there, not put caps here and there and then promise some big change
2. slap the programmer, who still did not fix the “updating market” message, which interrupts the UI and its functionality on the way.