Star Conflict v.1.0.5 Discussion

The battles should be more fair, but we would still be glad about more feedback.

OK here is one more

 

i just make it to list so easy to compare

 

Team A   vs  Team B

    7954   vs  7017

    7635   vs  6408

    6694   vs  6327

    6502   vs  5052

    6398   vs  4353

    4390   vs  1707

Team A   vs  Team B

    7954   vs  7017

    7635   vs  6408

    6694   vs  6327

    6502   vs  5052

    6398   vs  4353

    4390   vs  1707

 

The first ratings were based upon activity of each pilot - it is too early to compare them and say that teams are unfair. They will change according to the pilot’s actual tier and skill within the next few days. They need time to adjust.

The battles should be more fair, but we would still be glad about more feedback.

ok here is one more feedback.

 list too

 

TeamA vs TeamB

   7601 vs 7720

   5243 vs 7022

   5161 vs 6312

   4449 vs 5948

   3590 vs 2612

The Matchmaking is actually using the OLD SR Values !

The first ratings were based upon activity of each pilot - it is too early to compare them and say that teams are unfair. They will change according to the pilot’s actual tier and skill within the next few days. They need time to adjust.

 

 

well i feels that the rating is already good enough. you can see the other feedback on #163.

and if you need i can post out the result page. the result is the team that has more rating win with a massacre.

 

so i just make the list again to show what i want to say

 

Winners  vs  Losers

    7954   vs  7017     937 higher

    7635   vs  6408   1227 higher

    6694   vs  6327     387 higher

    6502   vs  5052   1450 higher

    6398   vs  4353   2045 higher

    4390   vs  1707   2683 higher

 

 

Losers vs Winers

   7601 vs 7720     119 lower

   5243 vs 7022   1779 lower

   5161 vs 6312   1151 lower

   4449 vs 5948   1501 lower

   3590 vs 2612     978 higher…thanks god…

 

i understand that the rating need times to be become more accurate by it self…

but do you think that the system or functions that to use the rate to make team that have some problem???

 

The Matchmaking is actually using the OLD SR Values !

Are u a dev? Or where u know this info?

 

BTW the matches more fair because no mix between T2-3-4, I don’t feel significant differencte between old and the new balance.

But the matches somehow come faster.

Are u a dev? Or where u know this info?

Rakza, if he still hasn’t quit, is one of the testers. Plus, being a GM has its perks, you know a lot of info not immediately available to us peasants.

The first ratings were based upon activity of each pilot - it is too early to compare them and say that teams are unfair. They will change according to the pilot’s actual tier and skill within the next few days. They need time to adjust.

 

and one more…what ever the rate itself is good or not. the number is not balance on teams…one team will got almost everone better than other team.

teamA VS teamB

  6478 vs 7250

  5480 vs 6728

  4493 vs 6320

  4058 vs 6161

  3720 vs 3252

and one more…what ever the rate itself is good or not. the number is not balance on teams…one team will got almost everone better than other team.

teamA VS teamB

  6478 vs 7250

  5480 vs 6728

  4493 vs 6320

  4058 vs 6161

  3720 vs 3252

 

Girl will you ever read any of the posts above yours? MM is not taking into account those numbers but the old ones. So you can keep spamming Team A vs Team B tables, it wont prove nothing and give no feedback.

Girl will you ever read any of the posts above yours? MM is not taking into account those numbers but the old ones. So you can keep spamming Team A vs Team B tables, it wont prove nothing and give no feedback.

yeah I only saw “Gizmomac” who with a “Space Explorer Beta” said that… thanks for “Oryngton” i know that he was a GM so what he said is kind of offical massage but not a joke or what he guess…

so you have a “Game Master” so, why any of your offical person come out and told us this???

The only offical massage i saw is from “Error” that they need feedback.

yeah I only saw “Gizmomac” who with a “Space Explorer Beta” said that… thanks for “Oryngton” i know that he was a GM so what he said is kind of offical massage but not a joke or what he guess…

so you have a “Game Master” so, why any of your offical person come out and told us this???

The only offical massage i saw is from “Error” that they need feedback.

 

Rakza is a GM and he said how the MM still works. Also we’re just community helpers, we have no “official powers” except in some necessary cases. 

Anyway devs don’t usually  speak about how matchamking is changed, they have their reasons, but for now we know that this numbers are not the reason you get put in Team A or Team B.

 

 

offical massage

Hummmmm, I was not aware that I was so close with some players :smiley:

Rakza is a GM and he said how the MM still works. Also we’re just community helpers, we have no “official powers” except in some necessary cases. 

Anyway devs don’t usually  speak about how matchamking is changed, they have their reasons, but for now we know that this numbers are not the reason you get put in Team A or Team B.

ohohoh…you mean that Bread man…sorry sorry my bad…i really didn’t see him…his bread takes all my attentions…

Hummmmm, I was not aware that I was so close with some players :smiley:

…good bread man…sorry i missed you are GM too…your bread is really funny…and also the red hat…

Hummmmm, I was not aware that I was so close with some players :smiley:

You know how it is… some people don’t like to shine others’ boots, so they go a little more personal…

 

…good bread man…sorry i missed you are GM too…your bread is really funny…and also the red hat…

Is it Christmas, already? No, we’re still a couple months off. Wtf, Rakza. You still haven’t taken care of that Reaper inside your brain, man?

Rakza, if he still hasn’t quit, is one of the testers. Plus, being a GM has its perks, you know a lot of info not immediately available to us peasants.

I’m so sorry. I didn’t know that. I have to run and get some corn to kneel on it. :smiley:

 

IMMA THORZA ! SON OF REAPER ! PROTECTOR OF THE GHARDLALA ! WEARER OF THE MIGHTY BREADJOLNIR !

 

KNEEL IN FRONT OF MEH !

u are also offtopic sir. :stuck_out_tongue:

I don’t have time to make that MM compare tables like Savanna, but what I see no more TechMixing so I promise I’ll be a good boy and on the weekend I’ll play more T4-5 matches.

 

I do not know if this is the place, but this clip reminds me so much for 0.7, 0.8 and today versions of SCon.

Meaning the sub-factions, different ship special modules, interactive gaming … vs today.

 

u are also offtopic sir. :stuck_out_tongue:

Strategical Move, Unfocus for 5 minutes and come back stronger on the Subject :D 

 

 

 

 don’t have time to make that MM compare tables like Savanna, but what I see no more TechMixing so I promise I’ll be a good boy and on the weekend I’ll play more T4-5 matches.

 

 

  • within 2-3 days (assuming sufficiently active playing) ratings will automatically come to normal values 

I think it’s like Positionning battles or placement Matchs. The Values are going to move a lot during this weekend then stabilize a bit later.

Savanna & Numberspam

 

And this is, why removing that number from the matches was a good idea;

and putting it there was a bad idea in the first place.

 

 

I am still curious about the new rating, since e.g. the usual T3 + SQ routine we had running a while now will make it a rollercoaster ride

but maybe that also will fill higher tiers better :slight_smile:

The Matchmaking is actually using the OLD SR Values !

 

Ok, so why the change in the rating system? If they’re not going to use the new ratings in the matchmaker, why did they make such a fuss over the new system? I mean, they only devoted an entire DEV BLOG to this incredible new update they had planned…

 

Does this go hand in hand with the removal of online pilot numbers from stations? And what about the removal of the rating tool-tip that allowed players to see what SR rating enemy pilots had? Are they trying to make the game harder for the players to understand and see what is going on?

 

Because this is really starting to stink of information suppression…

The numbers are a good thing because you can tell at a glance when something is not working properly.

 

Case in point, in many games your ‘number’ is meant to be your ranking in the game. So if you are “Gold 60” then you are in 60th place in Gold League. Now let’s assume for simplicity that there are 100 players per league and there are five leagues - Bronze, Silver, Gold, Platinum and Master.

 

If you see Gold 60 being matched against Gold 59 or Gold 61, then you know the matchmaking is working very nicely.

 

If you see Gold 60 vs Gold 50, or Gold 60 vs Gold 70, then you need to be sure that the difference in skill is relatively small, or that everyone understands why this matchup took place.

 

Gold 100 vs Gold 1 is almost certainly broken, since there is a HUGE disparity in skill there.

 

Silver 100 vs Platinum 1 means someone in the dev team needs to be taken out back and shot.

 

By concealing that kind of information, the Devs make it hard for players to spot potential issues in matchmaking, and give them less evidence to put forward when they are convinced there is an issue.

 

What we really need is for the Devs to come forward and state what they consider an acceptable boundary is. For example, in an ideal world what range of players would someone with SR 6,000 play against? Is it within a hundred points? Two hundred? Five hundred?