I put it simple
Right now
NONE ship
EXCEPT Interceptors
have a blindspot
Ok then…
Ok then…
The Pulse Laser is also overheating while not firing and and other weapons don`t cool down (so blind spot is not only IMO a bad idea, it also got implemented horribly )
That’s what happens, when u write a suggestion on the forum that isn’t thought through. One guy writes a topic after getting annoyed with something.
Devs realise that the feature even exists and 20 join in the whining. Eventho they would have never known (wich is an error on behalf of the devs) or noticed it.
So instead of adressing actual issues; like that we are getting tested upon for months now and the game balance has been different shades of arse, and yes it got better with the last patch, after months they finally took the efford and balanced in destros. All on the expense of our good will. Oh wait, no the Brokk, we are getting experimented upon again, right. Give the testers free roam so everybody can see how OP these ships are so they all want it. And by the time ppl start reaching their treasure, it gets nerved.
THIS ladys and gents is how StarConflict promotes new features. By keeping things unbalanced long enough, so ppl grind and grind and grind, and while they do that, they think that teamplay is OP and needs to be punished. Way to go…
About the disputed turning key:
The issue, and the reason why this ever was complained upon was the fact that crafted t5 ceptors can reach an insanely high turnrate. Wich had the effect that some ppl just rotated in a circle and shot. While they do that, they are most of the time super useless and just stall for time.
- You could have given a higher penalty for stacking verniers.
- Or given tacklers also a rotation slow .
- You could have even set a hard cap for vernier engines, wich is my no means more insane, than limiting the firing arc of the ship that relys 90% on maneuvering.
And now to the ppl that tell me to adapt.
You could have adapted aswell u know, like fly a tackler and/or use guns that are good at hitting things…
Or even take an ECM and drain that f.
Or you know, just do other things while hes busy turning all night long.
This situation is really bad, now with these short games and the endless time you need to spent to kill something, simply because every volley needs realigning. A ceptor that wants a kill, needs to run around the map and look for the next kill to steal.
Sooo much more skill based, gg.
…
i never suggested to fix endless spinner this way. my suggestions were different.
At first sight the blind spot thinghie seemed to me quite fair. then I’ve discovered that some weapons are really bad now (like i’ve said: shrapnel but also kinetic supercharge and phase suppressor. pretty much every low fire rate weapon).
So i still think that turn key should have been fixed. maybe not this way (since it broked a certain way of flying and some weapons. yep “broke”). maybe, like i’ve proposed: making camera following when using turns (something i took from ru forum).
I think you guys are just bad at flying interceptors.
P.S. pulse laser overheating is just a bug.
to be honest, after flying it a while, it really makes little sense like this.
there were better ideas; and its far too much. it isnt impossible to fly ceptors now, but it completely takes the fun and soul out of them.
it did stop the spinners. but it stopped basicly most people playing ceptor and we got stand off frig ball games.
I think you guys are just bad at flying interceptors.
Yeah of course it must be that… Oh wait, maybe we are just complaining about something that should not have happened in the first place? Mh? Or do you have an explaination why this is a good change?
And yeah, I am bad at flying Interceptors, NOW. BECAUSE of that change.
And yeah, I am bad at flying Interceptors, NOW. BECAUSE of that change.
git gud?
Yeah of course it must be that… Oh wait, maybe we are just complaining about something that should not have happened in the first place? Mh? Or do you have an explaination why this is a good change?
And yeah, I am bad at flying Interceptors, NOW. BECAUSE of that change.
Btw, why’d you come back? Since your post, and reasons why you apparently left in that post, according to people around, nothing have changed, so there should be no reasons for you to be back.
You know, people trusted you, they put likes to your post in hopes to never see you again, and yet here you are… So many people feel betrayed now.
Btw, why’d you come back? Since your post, and reasons why you apparently left in that post, according to people around, nothing have changed, so there should be no reasons for you to be back.
You know, people trusted you, they put likes to your post for you in hopes to never see you again, and yet here you are… So many people feel betrayed now.
Why do you always have to be such a xxxx?
git gud?
Not your business
Btw, why’d you come back? Since your post, and reasons why you apparently left in that post, according to people around, nothing have changed, so there should be no reasons for you to be back.
You know, people trusted you, they put likes to your post for you in hopes to never see you again, and yet here you are… So many people feel betrayed now.
Mhh… betrayed? Who? Unlike you, I had friends who wanted to play with me again.
I didn’t really come back. I play on request, not because I thought that I want to.
So then it would be natural for you to go and make another thread on how you are back, and we all should rejoice in celebration. When are you doing that?
https://forum.star-c…4guur32sppv7va6
And don’t forget to change your signature to that new thread 
Yeah of course it must be that… Oh wait, maybe we are just complaining about something that should not have happened in the first place? Mh? Or do you have an explaination why this is a good change?
And yeah, I am bad at flying Interceptors, NOW. BECAUSE of that change.
I didn’t really come back. I play on request, not because I thought that I want to.
o/
I hope you are happy, Kostyan.
So if you don’t play, and by request means here and there, how can you say you play interceptors bad because of a change and not because you simple don’t play it enough?
So if you don’t play, and by request means here and there, how can you say you play interceptors bad because of a change and not because you simple don’t play it enough?
Because in that case I take the words of a person I trust and I’m aware of who is a good interceptor pilot and complains as well. Which is enough reason for me to be mad about it as well.
Because in that case I take the words of a person I trust and I’m aware of who is a good interceptor pilot and complains as well. Which is enough reason for me to be mad about it as well.
Stop spying my messages u nerd.
That’s what happens, when u write a suggestion on the forum that isn’t thought through. One guy writes a topic after getting annoyed with something.
Devs realise that the feature even exists and 20 join in the whining. Eventho they would have never known (wich is an error on behalf of the devs) or noticed it.
So instead of adressing actual issues; like that we are getting tested upon for months now and the game balance has been different shades of arse, and yes it got better with the last patch, after months they finally took the efford and balanced in destros. All on the expense of our good will. Oh wait, no the Brokk, we are getting experimented upon again, right. Give the testers free roam so everybody can see how OP these ships are so they all want it. And by the time ppl start reaching their treasure, it gets nerved.
THIS ladys and gents is how StarConflict promotes new features. By keeping things unbalanced long enough, so ppl grind and grind and grind, and while they do that, they think that teamplay is OP and needs to be punished. Way to go…
About the disputed turning key:
The issue, and the reason why this ever was complained upon was the fact that crafted t5 ceptors can reach an insanely high turnrate. Wich had the effect that some ppl just rotated in a circle and shot. While they do that, they are most of the time super useless and just stall for time.
- You could have given a higher penalty for stacking verniers.
- Or given tacklers also a rotation slow .
- You could have even set a hard cap for vernier engines, wich is my no means more insane, than limiting the firing arc of the ship that relys 90% on maneuvering.
And now to the ppl that tell me to adapt.
You could have adapted aswell u know, like fly a tackler and/or use guns that are good at hitting things…
Or even take an ECM and drain that f.
Or you know, just do other things while hes busy turning all night long.
This situation is really bad, now with these short games and the endless time you need to spent to kill something, simply because every volley needs realigning…
Said the guy who took more than 4 minutes and a full missile salvo in a custom match:spark (high rof, fast missile implant) vs a spinning grey falcon (2 vernier + tetroxide thinghie) which didn’t shooted back a single time.
Then: curved ions spark vs grey falcon (2 vernier + strafe engine) spinning at 2000m away. More then 3 min and again a full salvo of fast missile.
Those are reasonable time…
You didn’t wanted to try by disabling your ping compensator and aim assist, which actually make easy to shoot people that just spin. I’ve said many time that I find easier to hit spinners while they are under camo 'cause: compensator turn off.
THIS IS A “GLITCH”, and the fact that you could even shoot must should have been fixed. I agree that this was not the way.
But that’s it.
Diverting people fire for so long IS an advantage. The fact that doing that they “become useless” is a fairy tale.
I think you guys are just bad at flying interceptors.
P.S. pulse laser overheating is just a bug.
Don’t go epeen contest man, you wuold easly loose against most of the people here.
(me included, and I’m a bad ceptor pilot)
Don’t go epeen contest man, you wuold easly loose against most of the people here.
Sure man, whatever lets you sleep at night 