P.S. (On your point about Lazy NASA management) Let me remind you that you WERE the ONE of those figures.
I was also one of the few in management who wasn’t being lazy. As an officer in NASA, I could only do so much to reduce laziness (especially when it came to dreads). If you recall, in my letter of resignation, I left NASA because there was a lack of caring for dreadnoughts in the NASA leadership (in general). At that time, Statue was the only VP who actually showed a genuine interest in dreadnoughts, and after Tillo demoted him to Officer for w/e reason, my feeling that NASA leadership was arrogant/nasty only grew, further driving me to quit NASA. Yes, your leadership now isn’t lazy, promoting Mecron to VP was really what fixed that for you. As for the arrogance of why I left, I still see that, especially in you.
The thing here is that Kostyan’s points are still in line with those aforementioned conditions. Vanguard and Colonization is not no-man’s land, everything else is.
I’m well aware that they are still in line. I’m just giving fore-warning that his arrogance and inability to be a reasonable human being aren’t going to win him anything.
oh and 1 more thing, if don’t realise that your self, if you’re coming in The zerg, you are purposely removing games from those sectors and those corporations in need, which is pretty much is not “helping the community”
Why zerg rush when we’re already accomplishing what we set out to do? The goal Arch leadership set was to help the community in dreadnoughts, and we are doing just that by dedicating these two sectors to be NASA/Arch free. I don’t know how the rest of Arch feels about it, but from the leadership I’ve talked to, we could care less about sector control. We care about getting games and having fun (clearly something you don’t value, or at least that’s the way you make it seem with your remarks). As for the main reason behind “why zerg rush”, we already accomplished the goal the zerg rushes were supposed to achieve. To prove you wrong (mainly Mustacho). To prove that no, you can’t drive us out of fed space, no, you can’t drive Arch into the ground, and yes, Arch is a more well-respected corp (in US time zone)
There is a simple logic behind all of this, the more you like NASA, the less games NASA have, the less games NASA have the less NASA we have, this has been this way for years.
Not true, not even in the slightest. I was in NASA over a year, and that was NEVER the case. If you liked NASA, NASA didn’t care, if you didn’t like NASA, NASA didn’t care. Whether or not someone liked/disliked NASA made no influence over whether or not NASA got games.
Although, to be perfectly honest, hating NASA will result in NASA not getting games more-so than liking NASA. It’s quite simple, a corp hates NASA, so they refuse to fight NASA. If enough corps begin to hate NASA, NASA will no longer get any games. (Sure, you may take off 10 or 20% every night, but you will never play another dreadnought game, as NASA at least).
I highly doubt any of us are here to “hug and drink tea”. Most of us are probably here because we enjoy this game and want to have fun playing it. And fun for some people isn’t the same as it is for others.