Quote
And I was just about to quit this game and save myself some free time for RL stuff…damn… ”)
Quote
And I was just about to quit this game and save myself some free time for RL stuff…damn… ”)
Nice, with this new we need to farm more ressources.
we have already 9 ressources to farm and they want to add 1 more (2 with the Empire dessy).
dev when will you stop to add new resources we have enougth.
4 hours ago, Swifter43021 said:
I guess that’s it.
Anyway this is a good thing!
See guys? Devs listens to us.
And what would be needed for the destroyer activator ?
4 hours ago, Scarecrow_1 said:
That one made my day
Maybe this [suggestion](< base_url >/index.php?/topic/31470-workshop-ship-parts-exchange-or-swap-function-needed/) can help some people.
I know that developers recently read it. ”)
While it’s good that they demonstrated the basic sense to make the Sirius internal structure used on the Tyrant in some way after seeing the flood of complaints they were getting, it was still a $%@# storm of complaints they brought completely on themselves, and if they had any sort of foresight at all, should have easily seen coming, as it should have been the extremely obvious reaction to anyone. Either they only just recently decided to have each faction of ship use its own internal structure, which would be bad, or they planed it all along, and just elected to not tell us till the eleventh hour of the Federation R14 destroyer phase, which would be far, far worse. Either way, how they handled the matter was still terrible, and should have come to no surprise at all that they would get buried in complaints due to it, but they went ahead, and did it anyhow, which demonstrates a distinct lack of concern to their players. Is it good that they made it so the Sirius internal structure can be used in part to make the Tyrant, yes, but it looked to be a move made out of self preservation on their part, and to me, most certainly does not excuse the lack of concern towards their players demonstrated by the fact they were ready to go through with the plan that they were in the first place.
22 minutes ago, Phoenix_Shi said:
While it’s good that they demonstrated the basic sense to make the Sirius internal structure used on the Tyrant in some way after seeing the flood of complaints they were getting, it was still a $%@# storm of complaints they brought completely on themselves, and if they had any sort of foresight at all, should have easily seen coming, as it should have been the extremely obvious reaction to anyone. Either they only just recently decided to have each faction of ship use its own internal structure, which would be bad, or they planed it all along, and just elected to not tell us till the eleventh hour of the Federation R14 destroyer phase, which would be far, far worse. Either way, how they handled the matter was still terrible, and should have come to no surprise at all that they would get buried in complaints due to it, but they went ahead, and did it anyhow, which demonstrates a distinct lack of concern to their players. Is it good that they made it so the Sirius internal structure can be used in part to make the Tyrant, yes, but it looked to be a move made out of self preservation on their part, and to me, most certainly does not excuse the lack of concern towards their players demonstrated by the fact they were ready to go through with the plan that they were in the first place.
Atleast they are showing they are listening. Before the New Loyalty system Dev Blog was made public we rarely ever had a changing influence on the Devs plan, now it seems they are really listening to our words, although only if it stretches across both forums(never seen a russian thread get closed so fast^^). Hey, it could be worse, i’ve seen things done by Devs without a single drop of intel given, although our devs kinda tried to pull that yet look at their change. I’m just glad they are listening to us finally, are they giving us exactly what we ask for? No. But atleast it’s a start…
10 minutes ago, Marcs25 said:
Atleast they are showing they are listening. Before the New Loyalty system Dev Blog was made public we rarely ever had a changing influence on the Devs plan, now it seems they are really listening to our words, although only if it stretches across both forums(never seen a russian thread get closed so fast^^). Hey, it could be worse, i’ve seen things done by Devs without a single drop of intel given, although our devs kinda tried to pull that yet look at their change. I’m just glad they are listening to us finally, are they giving us exactly what we ask for? No. But atleast it’s a start…
As I said, how much we didn’t like that move should have been the expected reaction to anyone, and their changing things somewhat didn’t feel like a change made for us, but out of self preservation, as in it was for their benefit. It’s sort of like if they expected more money from us eventually, but before getting it, they poisoned our food, then when it started to take effect, and we’re pleading for the antidote, they curtly said “fine, here,” and gave it to us, since we can’t really give them any money when we’re dead. You may be happy about them giving us the antidote, I’m still annoyed that they tried to poison our food in the first place.
Another way to look at the situation is that they were testing to see how far they could push their money making schemes, they just found out where the line was, that they went over it, and back stepped.
I kept telling you all this time it was but noone believed me…
7 hours ago, Scarecrow_1 said:
we will know how everything goes… when it actually begins… for now, enjoy this one CinnamonFake!
GOD i laughed hard xD Made me forget about the came i bought the other day xD
7 hours ago, Scarecrow_1 said:
Saving this… Just in case
Oh boi,the memes will start raining down.Guess I will have to be in the frontline for that too,huh?Wait,off-topic,off-topic,uhm,Sirius!
New resources by destroyers lol. Targem is full of surprise… Oh wait we were expecting it as the worst possible way and I became real.
I wonder what those will be…
On 29.10.2016 at 8:51 PM, Phoenix_Shi said:
As I said, how much we didn’t like that move should have been the expected reaction to anyone, and their changing things somewhat didn’t feel like a change made for us, but out of self preservation, as in it was for their benefit. It’s sort of like if they expected more money from us eventually, but before getting it, they poisoned our food, then when it started to take effect, and we’re pleading for the antidote, they curtly said “fine, here,” and gave it to us, since we can’t really give them any money when we’re dead. You may be happy about them giving us the antidote, I’m still annoyed that they tried to poison our food in the first place.
Another way to look at the situation is that they were testing to see how far they could push their money making schemes, they just found out where the line was, that they went over it, and back stepped.
I love how people get hyped in one direction. Imagine that situation:
All three R14 destroyers were supposed to be unique. All of them using different destroyer structures, but made from the same resources (electrum, neodium and beryllium), but different amount of them. Some guy responsible for naming things, puts into the database “Stabilized Destroyer Structures” instead of “Stabilized Sirius Structures”. It gets translated and released live. Someone spots that and logs a bug. Text bug, category 2, so not urgent. It gets fixed in about 2 weeks, patch comes, string in game is corrected, translations are deployed as well (some of them). Problem (from the developer point of view) solved.
Wouldn’t that be a simpler explanation than “they tried to poison our food?”.
On 06/10/2016 at 10:22 AM, CinnamonFake said:
There was a bug and vast majurity of pilots didn’t have day 1 missions. Now missions are available. To complete event anyone can miss even several days of it, so don’t worry, i’m sure you will get your destroyer as well as the others ”)
“Don’t worry” he said… Well thanks you captain obvious, I will miss the Sirius for one day as I said because it’s limited and because of a bug… Great work.
58 minutes ago, AkV said:
“Don’t worry” he said… Well thanks you captain obvious, I will miss the Sirius for one day as I said because it’s limited and because of a bug… Great work.
Kinda Late on that comment don’t you think? 
On 2016-10-30 at 4:45 PM, niripas said:
I love how people get hyped in one direction. Imagine that situation:
All three R14 destroyers were supposed to be unique. All of them using different destroyer structures, but made from the same resources (electrum, neodium and beryllium), but different amount of them. Some guy responsible for naming things, puts into the database “Stabilized Destroyer Structures” instead of “Stabilized Sirius Structures”. It gets translated and released live. Someone spots that and logs a bug. Text bug, category 2, so not urgent. It gets fixed in about 2 weeks, patch comes, string in game is corrected, translations are deployed as well (some of them). Problem (from the developer point of view) solved.
Wouldn’t that be a simpler explanation than “they tried to poison our food?”.
I still don’t get it why people built those structures if they didn’t intend to build destroyer right now.
If I wanted to, I could make up reasons that fit some agenda too, instead I’ve been stating things based on what we can see. Then since as I understand it the Russian forums blew up at the same time, for the same reason, and as it had been using that naming structure for weeks already by that point, it pretty much blows massive holes into that theory of yours.
I didn’t make them yet, but can understand why others did, and see no reason to effectively mock those that had for having done so, which I think you’ve already done before. Each of the rank 8, and 11 destroyers for each faction are also different, with somewhat unique traits, yet use the same sort of materials, when people saw the same build, and naming format for the first R14 destroyer, it was reasonable to expect the others to follow suit, especially when there was no info provided to make them think otherwise. People likely made them over time, when they didn’t plan to make the Sirius, as they felt doing so provided them a greater sense of having made progress, over just collecting a pile of raw materials. They may also have not realized until later, that they won’t be able to make it in time, or that it was some kind of timed thing, as most people playing online games tend to pay little, to no attention to news posts, or the forums. There’s various possible reasons, those are just a few.
You know, I’m getting a distinct sense of deja-vu here. You seem to have decided that instead of trying to keep the peace, as is your job, you will instead go after people providing negative feedback. What I’ve been posting has not broken any forum rules, I have been making posts that are on topic, but I’ve been a regular target for you, as has been other people providing negative feedback, while when another user was going after us aggressively, you ignored that person’s conduct, and instead joined in. Meaning you’re picking fights with other forum users, simply because you don’t like it when they provide negative feedback. Do you even understand what your job is on the forums? It’s bad enough when a regular user acts that way, but for someone with the “game master” tag attached, that’s just so much worse, it also reflects badly on the company for having promoted someone like that to such a position. I’ve submitted a report on you for these repeat actions of yours, and should you keep doing as you are, I’ll just drop you on my ignore list as well, for the same reason as the first person.
31 minutes ago, Phoenix_Shi said:
You know, I’m getting a distinct sense of deja-vu here. You seem to have decided that instead of trying to keep the peace, as is your job, you will instead go after people providing negative feedback. What I’ve been posting has not broken any forum rules, I have been making posts that are on topic, but I’ve been a regular target for you, as has be other people providing negative feedback, while when another user was going after us aggressively, you ignored that person’s conduct, and instead joined in. Meaning you’re picking fights with other forum users, simply because you don’t like it when they provide negative feedback. Do you even understand what your job is on the forums? It’s bad enough when a regular user acts that way, but for someone with the “game master” tag attached, that’s just so much worse, it also reflects badly on the company for having promoted someone like that to such a position. I’ve submitted a report on you for these repeat actions of yours, and should you keep doing as you are, I’ll just drop you on my ignore list as well, for the same reason as the first person.
Agreed. The staff, for the most part, is devoid of all social skills. They are abrasive and really are not very helpful. I admit that they do their share of work to get rid of spammers etc but that is essentially it. Anyone could do that.
I’m lost here, did the structure name got a fix or did we get another problem?