and its getting deeper and deeper …
Ps : the best example for this is Evil Space Bears, they can fly like noone other can but they constantly fall down in ranking and why ? Because they are “only” 47members
And if u someone wanna say ESB is not good enough GO OUT and fly against them and u gonna see how to play this game right
+1 :01212:
Ps : the best example for this is Evil Space Bears, they can fly like noone other can but they constantly fall down in ranking and why ? Because they are “only” 47members
And if u someone wanna say ESB is not good enough GO OUT and fly against them and u gonna see how to play this game right
ESB will be on farm status soon enough when they fix Loyalty gains 
Only corp that worries me on higher tiers is Zero, if they are anywhere near as good as their T2 players are then they will undoubtly put up a very good fight.
Mind you we nearly beat ESB in T3 with T2 ships when I forgot to change my ships and queued >.<
The amount of aids modules in T3 won them the game though 
I R so full of myself. Look at me!
Zero corp are ESB allies 
We are fighting together we are fighting against each other too Same as ESB with ESB and ESB against ESB
maybe 1 of the admins could make a statement …
and guys plz
BACK TO TOPIC !
Hello everyone,
There is a regulation since the patch where u lose 1% of ur maxpoints/hour (corp).
Its a very good idea but I think it would be better if u change it to
0-50member = -1% / hour
50-100 = -1.5% / hour
100-150 = -2% / hour
The reason :
If u check the ranking u will see corps like Space Invaders are rang 3 and they are 140members other corps with 50 members are in top 10 too.
so my problem is if u are 150members in ur corp u can 000000 ur lose and even win some points because EVERYTIME someone is online and EVERYTIME someone play.
I think I dont have to explain the rest.
that would be fail I have paid real money for my corp size… and your ideal would put smaller corps verse larger corps, ok i see were your coming from but as I payed for every slot in my corp I dont feel i should be penalized, further more I have crushed corps with my group 3 times my size with only 40 ppl in corp, for instance DW when they we active so if i can do it you should, I look and scout out the best players cuz each slot in my corp is valuable maybe you should adopt the same view
that would be fail I have paid real money for my corp size… and your ideal would put smaller corps verse larger corps, ok i see were your coming from but as I payed for every slot in my corp I dont feel i should be penalized, further more I have crushed corps with my group 3 times my size with only 40 ppl in corp, for instance DW when they we active so if i can do it you should, I look and scout out the best players cuz each slot in my corp is valuable maybe you should adopt the same view
Your view on the matter is so biased.
How do you think any smaller corporation can compete with a 150 member corporation? Owait, they can’t.
And 40 is far from small… Small is when your corp is not even on the roster list.
Ps : the best example for this is Evil Space Bears, they can fly like noone other can but they constantly fall down in ranking and why ? Because they are “only” 47members
And if u someone wanna say ESB is not good enough GO OUT and fly against them and u gonna see how to play this game right
truth esb fly extremely well.they know their fits and they know how to pilot. They dont pub stomp for braggin rights either. They are all respectable and work to building the community. but back to the topic at hand
the ladders are really only important because clan warfare hasn’t been released yet. i think that once they finally release the clan warfare then ladders wont be a big issue.
Talk about a biased comment lol.
Whoever think the ranking as they are right now are ANY indication of skill at all is simply put: an idiot.
WHEN they decide to make the ladders so that smaller corporations can compete on them aswell, THEN you have ladders that are actually some indication of skill.
But right now, it is impossible to get anywhere near the top with just 3-4 members like we ([8D]) are right now, and being a competitive player I think this sucks a bunch.
Highest we have been has been maybe ~45 on the B and ~30 on the F with just 3 of us active and that basicly requires ~12 hours of playing per day.
Right now as things are, [8D] Paisti absolutely dominates T2 Realistic farming everyone that queues it, some names include EVO, SpIn, DR and ZAG.
So yes, there should be decay on the rating based on the member count, maybe something like
0-50 = 1%
50-100 = 2%
100-150 = 3%
Also good joke Uhmari on that last bit.
This is actually not true.
Pvp Rating B shows how players are performing as a team in combat.
By having larger amounts of B rating, it shows that the corporations player base is performing well.
People saying that stats have no show of skill, is just a bunch of whiney kids who cannot compete with the big boys.
We are not even making a push at pvp, we are just casually farming pve, and we are still owning the meters.
If you think rating = no skill, lets see you prove you have skill with no rating.
This simply is ignorance of knowing the system was designed to show the performance of these corporation.
Now that being said, i will agree, that some mechanical changes need to be made.
For example some clans are spaming tier 1 games to pad
-
PvP F
-
PvP B
-
Killed
-
Personal KDA
Changes need to be made to resolve this.
truth esb fly extremely well.they know their fits and they know how to pilot. They dont pub stomp for braggin rights either. They are all respectable and work to building the community. but back to the topic at hand
the ladders are really only important because clan warfare hasn’t been released yet. i think that once they finally release the clan warfare then ladders wont be a big issue.
You just proved you don’t know anything about the game lol
This is actually not true.
Pvp Rating B shows how players are performing as a team in combat.
By having larger amounts of B rating, it shows that the corporations player base is performing well.
People saying that stats have no show of skill, is just a bunch of whiney kids who cannot compete with the big boys.
We are not even making a push at pvp, we are just casually farming pve, and we are still owning the meters.
If you think rating = no skill, lets see you prove you have skill with no rating.
This simply is ignorance of knowing the system was designed to show the performance of these corporation.
Now that being said, i will agree, that some mechanical changes need to be made.
For example some clans are spaming tier 1 games to pad
PvP F
PvP B
Killed
Personal KDA
Changes need to be made to resolve this.
Changes need to be made to get the truly awful corps like EVO off the top of the list and down where they belong because you guys obviously don’t have any skill in PVP and that has been proven countless of times, only thing you have is numbers.
How exactly are smaller corps supposed to be able to compete on the Ratings as they are right now? Any of them? Yeah, they can’t. Only way to compete on Ratings if you wish such a thing is spam 150 members into your corporation and oh, would you look at that, you are top 1 now that you got 150 members! How hard was that now?
I think the only one who is ignorant here is YOU.
ESB Had 2-3 million more points then anyone, and held there climbing and climbing, its because of them the decay was added.
They only had 46 players.
This claim that Numbers effect the ratings, is very inaccurate. Lower pop corps can compete for top positions.
Telling everyone they are bad (which seems to be your gig) And that you are the best only makes you appear as a tool.
There is a reason why we have been top for a month now, So keep qqing about it, and we will continue to be on top of the ratings.
ESB Had 2-3 million more points then anyone, and held there climbing and climbing, its because of them the decay was added.
They only had 46 players.
This claim that Numbers effect the ratings, is very inaccurate. Lower pop corps can compete for top positions.
Telling everyone they are bad (which seems to be your gig) And that you are the best only makes you appear as a tool.
There is a reason why we have been top for a month now, So keep qqing about it, and we will continue to be on top of the ratings.
Do tell how lol, I’m very interested in hearing how 10 man corps can compete in the rankings even if they play 24/7 basicly.
We got maybe 5-6 active members and highest we have been is #24, it is pretty much impossible for small corps to compete on rankings so they are pointless basicly.
More members = higher ranking, your corp proves this right so well lol
Numbers != Skill
ESB Had 2-3 million more points then anyone, and held there climbing and climbing, its because of them the decay was added.
They only had 46 players.
This claim that Numbers effect the ratings, is very inaccurate. Lower pop corps can compete for top positions.
Telling everyone they are bad (which seems to be your gig) And that you are the best only makes you appear as a tool.
There is a reason why we have been top for a month now, So keep qqing about it, and we will continue to be on top of the ratings.
A bit offtopick, but it would be nice to have some sort of global player ranking, where players could prove that they actually are good, insted of saying it, or just being inside a 100+ member corp. Then i.e. if most of guild players are in like top 100, then regardless of what the guild ranking say, that guild is still good.
Edit: I aciddently posted this here.
A bit offtopick, but it would be nice to have some sort of global player ranking, where players could prove that they actually are good, insted of saying it, or just being inside a 100+ member corp. Then i.e. if most of guild players are in like top 100, then regardless of what the guild ranking say, that guild is still good.
http://star-conflict.com/en/ratings/
this is eternal rating
Actually this is not an exact skill meter. Some of players are T2, some T4, some inactive for a long time. Pick the weekly intervals for more actual information but this is not a skill count too because of rating isn’t tech dependable You can farm newbies at t2 and raise your ELO without any troubles. One thing I can tell that anyone with above 1300 is actually a decent player, 1500+ is a relative good player.
http://star-conflict.com/en/ratings/kills/current/weekly/2013-04-07/elo/-1/1/