You will already be getting loyalty when your side of conflict gains control over location of another side. Also, all contracts will work in SecCon too.
On that note, is it possible to gain loyalty for a faction that isn’t part of your race? If I’m flying Empire, can I get loyalty for the Armada, Vanguard, Raid and/or Techs?
I would like to see ALL ship tiers usefull.
T5 exclusive sector rewards: Synergy + GS
T4 exclusive sector rewards: Synergy + Artifacts
T3 exclusive sector rewards: Synergy + Loyalty
T2 exclusive sector rewards: Synergy + Credits x2
T1 exclusive sector rewards: Synergy + Credits
Agreed 100%.
I would like to see ALL ship tiers usefull.
T5 exclusive sector rewards: Synergy + GS
T4 exclusive sector rewards: Synergy + Artifacts
T3 exclusive sector rewards: Synergy + Loyalty
T2 exclusive sector rewards: Synergy + Credits x2
T1 exclusive sector rewards: Synergy + Credits
+1
again 
…with bigger bonuses for lower tiers!
dat real??
I would go for:
100k creds
35 GS
40 Artifacts
I’ve edited my post : and you can have 16 cycles so (4x16)xCorp-Member, that’s not so bad.
On that note, is it possible to gain loyalty for a faction that isn’t part of your race? If I’m flying Empire, can I get loyalty for the Armada, Vanguard, Raid and/or Techs?
Contract 
Your allegiance for the Vouchers rewards in SQ are determined by your CEO(in case of no Corp’s juridisction choose before the patch) But you can still earn other faction’s voucher with contracts
You will already be getting loyalty when your side of conflict gains control over location of another side. Also, all contracts will work in SecCon too.
I know, I’m just pointing that Loyalty Vouchers is what we need, we don’t need anything else to be honest.
Already a huge discrepancy between in game and forum poll. Guess where that discrepancy is? Option A!
Devs… Antibus… whoever I need to be talking to… please listen to us for once on these things. Option A is the option people vote when they just want Gold Standards. Please get into the habit of making Option A the “don’t know, don’t care” option.
Because we are now going to have a repeat of last time; we do not want Option A, but you are not going to listen because your in-game poll is biased.
I know, I’m just pointing that Loyalty Vouchers is what we need, we don’t need anything else to be honest.
Agreed - The loyalty voucher system is the biggest grind / hold up in the game. There needs to a reduction in prices or an increase in gain from somewhere. I cannot upgrade my T5 ships in any foreseeable time scale beyond green equipment due to the huge amount of vouchers needed for 1 measly module :facepalm:
Previously I have 2 of the 6 factions to level 15 meaning I could buy mk 3 gear for credits - Those then turned to loyalty vouchers which got ‘spent’ within a few days of the patch. Its the worst part of the game currently in my opinion and needs to be revised / reworked. I am not saying ‘its crap get rid’ - I just think maybe the grind needs to be reduced so that it falls in line with the synergy grind etc
Or
An increase in Loyalty vouchers that is noticable from some where (Better contact rewards / Rewards from Sec Con etc)
Question: if player has purchased a booster giving more PvP loot or synergy, will the booster still be used (counted) if he plays sector conquest, even as he got less (or no) gain from the booster?
No it should not work in SecCon, there is also a notification about this:
On that note, is it possible to gain loyalty for a faction that isn’t part of your race? If I’m flying Empire, can I get loyalty for the Armada, Vanguard, Raid and/or Techs?
Contracts are working quite fine there.
Already a huge discrepancy between in game and forum poll. Guess where that discrepancy is? Option A!
Devs… Antibus… whoever I need to be talking to… please listen to us for once on these things. Option A is the option people vote when they just want Gold Standards. Please get into the habit of making Option A the “don’t know, don’t care” option.
Because we are now going to have a repeat of last time; we do not want Option A, but you are not going to listen because your in-game poll is biased.
And… you base this assumption on what?
The fact that quite a few people told me this is precisely what they did.
but also because the math fits.
And… you base this assumption on what?
I can guarantee you that, if you change it daily, option A is STILL going to be the most clicked on.
Because 10GS > anything else.
I change my vote to sinergy, I was told we won’t gain any sinergy there, so… xxxx it.
Sector conquest should benefit squads and corporations
Squads in SQ should make 50% more rewards.
SQ should have normal synergy and credit gain.
And… you base this assumption on what?
What do you base your assumption on, that Jasan is incorrect?
Everyone that I’ve spoken to about this has thus far found it agreeable; that this factor changes the outcome of the poll by at the very least 5-10%.
All that is required for this hypothesis to be found correct, is a mere 1 in 10 or 1 in 20 people to make that careless vote.
(I base my assumption on this)
All that is required for this hypothesis to be proved/disproved, is a most tiny amount of effort, place the most redundant option “I don’t know/care” at the top, the order of the rest is irrelevant.
From my perspective it seems that you, the devs, and all the careless voters have nothing to lose from this, yet there are those of us, who care about the turnout of this game, have everything to gain.
For that reason, could you at least humour the idea and forward it to whoever relevant? Because I believe Jasan is correct here.
And… you base this assumption on what?
No matter the poll you put in-game, always option A wins because the vast mayority of the players don’t give a single xxxx about the poll, they want the free 10 GS.
And to everyone else posting here: Don’t you worry, and don’t vote, it’s a waste of time, we always get something random that nobody asked for. Take a look at the previous polls and you’ll realise it’s useless.
What do you base your assumption on, that Jasan is incorrect?
Everyone that I’ve spoken to about this has thus far found it agreeable; that this factor changes the outcome of the poll by at the very least 5-10%.
All that is required for this hypothesis to be found correct, is a mere 1 in 10 or 1 in 20 people to make that careless vote.
(I base my assumption on this)
All that is required for this hypothesis to be proved/disproved, is a most tiny amount of effort, place the most redundant option “I don’t know/care” at the top, the order of the rest is irrelevant.
From my perspective it seems that you, the devs, and all the careless voters have nothing to lose from this, yet there are those of us, who care about the turnout of this game, have everything to gain.
For that reason, could you at least humour the idea and forward it to whoever relevant? Because I believe Jasan is correct here.
No one was saying that he is wrong - yet the argument ‘some fellas told that other fella, that’… is not entirely faultproof. We will, however look into the matter of… hm ‘greedy voters’
No one was saying that he is wrong - yet the argument ‘some fellas told that other fella, that’… is not entirely faultproof. We will, however look into the matter of… hm ‘greedy voters’
Fair enough, it’s nothing about greedy voters, quit skewing it or putting words in ma mouth dude. Or if you misunderstand, I can explain it again.
Hey, at this point, even I dont care about ANY ingame polls for any game, if its sole purpose is to give me a prize after i click a random choice.
Just direct people to the forum polls if you want to have real voters and commenters so we can remove the biased votes.