Okay, I want to try and be fair here, so let me say that I do like playing Destroyers. I confess to being one of those sad people who think positioning and build should be more important than twitch-play reflexes. The tweaks to their controls made them much more playable, and while they can be a little dull to use at times, I don’t resent flying them.
However, I do resent flying against them. Destroyers have sucked the fun out of T3 for me. I find them too damn frustrating to take on in anything other than another Destroyer.
These ships are a mistake. A terrible, game-breaking mistake. Get them out of PvP. Put them in a different mode entirely - maybe some kind of “corp battle” mode for T3 and up where squads have no restrictions and their ability to dominate matches can be countered by organised squads.
But in standard queue, where squads are banned and pugs are the norm? No. You can’t have them. They have put an end to T3 as we know it, and they’ll do the same to T4 and T5.
And what happens when people only have Destroyers in their lineup?
They can rage on the forum about it! Easy peasy
I doubt that fix will work because it was never done for LRF spam, no matter how many games were ruined by having half the team afk in spawn
In the end Lrfs where here from the beginning and they find the way to let them “fit” in pvp.
Destros are a totally new class that don’t have his “right” place. I think a solution can be found by banning them from pvp or limiting their presence on the battlefield.
Destroyers as a ship are not the problem, it is the fact that some battles have none and some have all of them. Take them in to battle mm consideration like said above and all is solved.
And if T3 is giving you troubles, fly in T4. Really. My Procyon still owns in T4, but not quite as much.
Destroyers as a ship are not the problem, it is the fact that some battles have none and some have all of them. Take them in to battle mm consideration like said above and all is solved.
And if T3 is giving you troubles, fly in T4. Really. My Procyon still owns in T4, but not quite as much.
Do you ever read what you type? ‘X is not imbalanced, it’s that the games where X is present are out of balance by default.’ lolwat
Do you ever read what you type? ‘X is not imbalanced, it’s that the games where X is present are out of balance by default.’ lolwat
And what is your argument? I agree with him. Stacking of a shiptype can destroy any balance. Or do you think, that a team of x ships + y ships vs. a mix of ships will have it easy?
And what is your argument? I agree with him. Stacking of a shiptype can destroy any balance.
Because destroyers are undeniably OP. His logic is to counterbalance destroyers with destroyers, and that’s no solution to anything. It’s just shooing symptoms away while leaving the root of the problem untouched.
Or do you think, that a team of x ships + y ships vs. a mix of ships will have it easy?
Because destroyers are undeniably OP. His logic is to counterbalance destroyers with destroyers, and that’s no solution to anything. It’s just shooing symptoms away while leaving the root of the problem untouched.
Sorry, what?
Destroyers are so OP, that ceptors can solo them. WOW.
If they would be so OP, why devs state the oposite???
looking at the balance of a game as complicated as StarConflict from a 1v1 angle is, mmm… how to say it politely, mmm… a wrong angle (help me out, i am bad at this polite thingy-nonsense)?
