Koro, your 3 question could be optimized. Why? Option b and c are both a ‘No’. I would suggest it to be like this:
Should Boosters be unlocked by ranks or by GS option, just like the Implants are?
o Boosters should be unlocked by GS
o Boosters should be unlocked by ranks
o I do not agree with this suggestion in general.
o I am indifferent or unsure.
Thank you for the poll, Koro !!
P.S.: You may know that there is an inclusive OR and an exclusive OR in logic and mathematics and language… So to answer one question which contains two statements connected by an OR might be problematic in every use-case. However, you can decide to do more specific questions, that is break the OR question in half and make two out of it, for example, or repeat the question in your possible answer : " yes, boosters should be unlocked by GS and/or by ranks". I replaced your ‘or’ with a ‘and/or’ and you see it can be used interchangably (in the sense of an inclusive or), imho that indicates the problematic meaning of ‘or’ in the poll above.
It isn’t a boost anymore if you can keep it forever.
Boosters are made to give a small bonus to those who don’t care about credits. This change make them like any implants : Something everybody must have like implants and need to be all equals in term of value and power.
But a small option “Auto refill” like for ammos and missiles would be cool.
Read my suggestion, because you read it bad. It’s not mandatory to have it equipped, because you can choose NOT to equip one!
If you can have it permanently and need to pay once again to change, then it’s not a booster anymore. It’s an implant.
Boosters are made to be a “boost” to players that don’t care about credit anymore, not just a permanent buff.
Especially when you see that boosters aren’t all equals.
People, who don’t read my thread in its entirety or don’t remember or understand what I wrote, should do so again. It could also work like the Implants.
We have been waiting for months now and mind you, this suggestion is the 2nd suggestion of the same 1st suggestion. 1st one is even older, like 16 months!
I would appreciate current pending status on this suggestion, CinnamonFake.
Yes, it’s still on to do list. As you can see there were some changes with boosters recently, as well as with others active effects. So we will do it at its time