On 5/26/2018 at 8:58 AM, xXThunderFlameXx said:
Didn’t Karud and Brokk cost the same amount of ship parts, which is 600? And also, if we will get the Star Marathons back then they better make them more rewarding, in case you don’t remember they used to give you a container for 10 won battles, which for the most part were either Fire Supports or Defence Contracts, the problem is that the container gives 2, 10 or 50 parts, for a ship that requires 600 that is an unbearably low amount, and you had that task available once a day, so it would take at most 300 days, or approx. 10 months of daily playing to get one, on very rare occasions you would get 10 parts
Please don’t remind me that marathon… I remember that for 3 ships that were available then (Brokk, Stingray and IIRC Archelon) I did over two thousand Fire Support runs.
2 hours ago, niripas said:
Please don’t remind me that marathon… I remember that for 3 ships that were available then (Brokk, Stingray and IIRC Archelon) I did over two thousand Fire Support runs.
Wow…that was a marathon alright…
Anyway, the new Jerry LRF is alright but another ECM interceptor? Really? Just when I had come to terms with Karuds remote ammo detonating my torpedoes and Zhens making me crash into walls.
Time to start upgrading more Proton Walls I guess.
On 5/31/2018 at 12:42 AM, ANiMA said:
Wow…that was a marathon alright…
Anyway, the new Jerry LRF is alright but another ECM interceptor? Really? Just when I had come to terms with Karuds remote ammo detonating my torpedoes and Zhens making me crash into walls.
Time to start upgrading more Proton Walls I guess.
Another LRF, really, not like being oneshot by 13k thermal without a hint where the real guy is was already annoying enogh…
(I mean i don’t mind 1011, there are bigger problems in the game, but you know what i mean)
So don’t complain, damnit…
The distribution of R 16/17 is unfair and types used by both Empire and Jericho were heavily biased…
I’m not complaining, tho, just stating confusion.
On 5/30/2018 at 6:45 PM, SMOKEYSHADOWS said:
umm, no, work your way up like everybody else, low ranks already get stupid damage buffs, you want a trophy w/ that?
well u see, becaiuse of all the flipping grinding is very very hard to lvl up
On 5/24/2018 at 9:17 PM, Rakza said:
… considering Object NY18 as a Guard but more as an Abomination that shouldn’t be in the game. Its special module is nothing near other guard’s special modules and the “Energy Destabilizer Field” isn’t something that Guards or anything else should have.
…
To me, from the beginning, it was a sub-destroyer class of a ship design, a lesser destroyer and bigger frigate … It also will get its nerf cycles in due time devs see fit …
who thinks the following nerfs would fix interceptor pilots complaining about NY18?
-reduce range of energy destabilizer to 50% in active mode, and 10% otherwise
-reduce energy destabilizer range to 2000m
-reduce energy destabilizer active time to 8 seconds
this changes the energy destabilizer to a more traditional guard module and removes most of the issues intie pilots normally complain about, (wow, they really don’t like having equipment meant to counter them, do they?)
5 minutes ago, evo888 said:
who thinks the following nerfs would fix interceptor pilots complaining about NY18?
-reduce range of energy destabilizer to 50% in active mode, and 10% otherwise
-reduce energy destabilizer range to 2000m
-reduce energy destabilizer active time to 8 seconds
this changes the energy destabilizer to a more traditional guard module and removes most of the issues intie pilots normally complain about, (wow, they really don’t like having equipment meant to counter them, do they?)
I’d like this. And tbh it shouldn’t interfere with implant energy regen stuff. Like the energy proofer multipurpose thing and the incoming damage energy thing.
4 hours ago, evo888 said:
who thinks the following nerfs would fix interceptor pilots complaining about NY18?
-reduce range of energy destabilizer to 50% in active mode, and 10% otherwise
-reduce energy destabilizer range to 2000m
-reduce energy destabilizer active time to 8 seconds
this changes the energy destabilizer to a more traditional guard module and removes most of the issues intie pilots normally complain about, (wow, they really don’t like having equipment meant to counter them, do they?)
Wrong topic, mate 
Looks like Executor was a bit of a disappointment…i hope Dyrwnwnwnwnwwn would be at least SLIGHTLY better.
On 6/10/2018 at 4:22 PM, evo888 said:
who thinks the following nerfs would fix interceptor pilots complaining about NY18?
-reduce range of energy destabilizer to 50% in active mode, and 10% otherwise
-reduce energy destabilizer range to 2000m
-reduce energy destabilizer active time to 8 seconds
this changes the energy destabilizer to a more traditional guard module and removes most of the issues intie pilots normally complain about, (wow, they really don’t like having equipment meant to counter them, do they?)
As long as the NY18 has nerfing potential >5km to intys - all is fine with me. But why nerf energy on othet ships, too? OP-Intys find a way around energy crisis- but other ships who depend on it? See what ships are coming up in >r15 rank model and you get wise. Besides NY18 is not that of a threat you make it , it’s nice ship with good enginnering creativity – very good for SC!!!
Why?
My Wazzi “Waltzing Mathilda” was very expensive - never was OP like Taikin nor Thar’ga from beginning - so never had that Eugen-super-kill inOP-ship-moment - but still got nerfed – and no real good Engi stuff coming .-. and if : only for slow Empire tank-like Engies??
why??
