46 minutes ago, GatoGrande said:
Wolfhound is fatter then guards.
You can easy test it. Just ask friends to take guard and park your Fathound near it. Than look at ships from profile.
Fathound should be downsized by at least 20%. .
Also IGNIS is crap. To low projectile speed to low range of projectile.
Even if it say that it have 400+ rate of fire when I compare it with RF blaster it looks like half of it.
Really? Didnt realise it was as big as a guard, i mean its very agile but the thing is paper, like literally, 2 tempest missiles from a destroyer kills it, im not even kidding.
New info for [DeathWasp](< base_url >/index.php?/profile/259932-nuclearfall/ “Go to DeathWasp’s profile”) what SRS thinks about Fathound and Granite
http://prntscr.com/iovs1m
can you translate “govni, govno” pls?
P.S: I got it now but was a hazzle to get it into kyrillic … but information is meh … not detailed etc …
I can, but I won’t.
You can do it with google translate too.
On 9.3.2018 at 2:35 PM, SunnySweet said:
I can, but I won’t.
You can do it with google translate too.
writing this didn’t take you longer than simply answering an honest question?
On 8.3.2018 at 12:25 PM, DeathWasp said:
where are u getting the 66 from?
gotcha. wait… what? srsly?
Feels like piranha without kinetic bonus
11 hours ago, _terrorblade said:
Feels like piranha without kinetic bonus
It’s even worse, trust me. I won’t be spending any more electrum for sure. I also lost too many due to the Cap limit alone.
60 enriched electrum is an insult. These ships don’t even deserve to be worth of 30 enriched electrum alone, each.
I got a feeling, just a hunch, that they are already planning higher ranks, like 18-20 if not even higher.
We should all refrain from spending any more until we can test the ships on Public Test Server. Skula says: “No log -> no bug”. I say: “No public test -> no ship -> no money -> no game.”
In short, this is ORDER 60!