Yeah, I normally dont have issues with your members, just that one. Ill take screenies if stuff like this ever comes up again though. I hold no ill will at all, never do. Life is to short to. 
If you’re insinuating that DYN2 (or even DYN) throws matches against DYN, that’s never happened in a DYN squad I’ve been in and against policy (to my knowledge).
Usually, the guys on my squad and I go out of their way to shoot down the other DYN2 and DYN corp members on the other team :fighter:
As a DYN2 pilot, let me assure you that the converse of the above holds true for us as well
True that. As another Dynamo pilot, I want to stress that playing against Dynamis, I do what possible to forage them with my dastardly lazors, mines and whatever`s at hand. :storm:
I can tell you that most DYN members have TS3, while it is slightly more uncommon for DYN2 members. Hence, DYN2 is not always as coordinated as DYN.
Like yulogy said, DYN2 and DYN are the same corporation under the same CEO. Claims to the contrary are false, and I would also be interested to know who is making these claims.
I personally enjoy shooting down my corp-mates. There’s something satisfying in taking out yulogy in his Jericho frigates. I also don’t doubt that many corp members enjoy shooting me down, if for no other reason than for my status as an officer.
Actually, maybe we should have a corporation event based on this? “Kill the officers”, or somesuch during PUG matches…
Yeah, I normally dont have issues with your members, just that one. Ill take screenies if stuff like this ever comes up again though. I hold no ill will at all, never do. Life is to short to.
Good to know that we can all work together and harbor no ill will. Thank you.
True that. As another Dynamo pilot, I want to stress that playing against Dynamis, I do what possible to forage them with my dastardly lazors, mines and whatever`s at hand. :storm:
Lol. I think you took me out a few times just a couple of days ago. :good:
NASA, hates you, in a good way, your a goal to overcome.
My opinion of Dynamis is that they are pretty much the same as Evo… ZOMG LETS ZERG T2 AND GET TOP OF CHARTS WE ARE SO BADASS!!!..my question to the community is this…when do you ever see a DYN tag in t3 or t4 and when you do…are they on top of the charts? I think not.
My opinion of Dynamis is that they are pretty much the same as Evo… ZOMG LETS ZERG T2 AND GET TOP OF CHARTS WE ARE SO BADASS!!!..my question to the community is this…when do you ever see a DYN tag in t3 or t4 and when you do…are they on top of the charts? I think not.
Not sure if serious, or trolling Uhmari…
NASA, hates you, in a good way, your a goal to overcome.
Keep us on our toes! Brings to mind the phrase “steel sharpening steel”. Both of our groups will just keep getting better and better. I often get worried when going against a squad of NASA. Really good team work.
My opinion of Dynamis is that they are pretty much the same as Evo… ZOMG LETS ZERG T2 AND GET TOP OF CHARTS WE ARE SO BADASS!!!..my question to the community is this…when do you ever see a DYN tag in t3 or t4 and when you do…are they on top of the charts? I think not.
There are many players in our corperation who are not to the point of jumping to T3. I myself play either T2 or T3, and only recently settled to a hanger of T3 ships that I can fly well. Going from T2 to T3 is a large jump. The increase in difficulty, coupled with increases in repair and ammo refills, teds to keep many from making the jump.
My opinion of Dynamis is that they are pretty much the same as Evo… ZOMG LETS ZERG T2 AND GET TOP OF CHARTS WE ARE SO BADASS!!!..my question to the community is this…when do you ever see a DYN tag in t3 or t4 and when you do…are they on top of the charts? I think not.
Probably trolling. There are DYN in T3, though probably very rare in T4 due to the costs. And those of us that play T3 do fairly well win or lose, granted we aren’t as stellar as ESB. But we do appear often on the top of the score list. There’s even screenshots; Luckyo posted a couple to show squads using the OP frigate balls. And just a few days ago I remember a fun game with Error as captain. He managed to die spectacularly but I managed to squeak out top place on the team. Players of T3 know we are out there.
Keep us on our toes! Brings to mind the phrase “steel sharpening steel”. Both of our groups will just keep getting better and better. I often get worried when going against a squad of NASA. Really good team work.
There are many players in our corperation who are not to the point of jumping to T3. I myself play either T2 or T3, and only recently settled to a hanger of T3 ships that I can fly well. Going from T2 to T3 is a large jump. The increase in difficulty, coupled with increases in repair and ammo refills, teds to keep many from making the jump.
Here Lies the problem… Dynamis is pronouncing itself as top of the leader-boards when the actual corp ranking itself is flawed. If a corp who is primarily in a higher tier has a tougher time winning battles and gaining points for the scoreboard because lets face it, most of the skilled players in this game are in t3 not t2. Yet the ranking system doesn’t distinguish between tiers…yes its hard to make the jump up to t3 from t2 we know we had to do it. All I am saying is that rankings should either be separate between tiers or higher tiers should give a bigger bonus. You think you are better because you are on top of the charts and then tell the community that the vast majority of your clan is in t2 or lower. The fact of the matter is that you are not even one of the top 5 guilds in the game.
Here Lies the problem… Dynamis is pronouncing itself as top of the leader-boards when the actual corp ranking itself is flawed. If a corp who is primarily in a higher tier has a tougher time winning battles and gaining points for the scoreboard because lets face it, most of the skilled players in this game are in t3 not t2. Yet the ranking system doesn’t distinguish between tiers…yes its hard to make the jump up to t3 from t2 we know we had to do it. All I am saying is that rankings should either be separate between tiers or higher tiers should give a bigger bonus. You think you are better because you are on top of the charts and then tell the community that the vast majority of your clan is in t2 or lower. The fact of the matter is that you are not even one of the top 5 guilds in the game.
I believe yulogy explains i well enough. I wil not dispute that the ranking system MAY be flawed, that it MAY not accurately score corperations because it doesnot distinguish between tiers. However, us not being in even the top 5 corps by your estimate? Sigh, I am just going to stop here, else I am going to rant and this is not the appropriate place. Thank you for your opinion, it has given me a bit to think about.
I believe yulogy explains i well enough. I wil not dispute that the ranking system MAY be flawed, that it MAY not accurately score corperations because it doesnot distinguish between tiers. However, us not being in even the top 5 corps by your estimate? Sigh, I am just going to stop here, else I am going to rant and this is not the appropriate place. Thank you for your opinion, it has given me a bit to think about.
You cannot hope to be considered one of the best corporations in the game if the majority of your members have not progressed in t3 when there are numerous corporations battling at higher tiers then you. When DYN members try to play in t3 they are promptly thrown down by members of ESB, Nova, NASA, STAR, DR. By encouraging your members to stay in t2 to exploit the leader-boards you are actually taking advantage of newer players of the game, and discouraging these newer players to play, learn. or try to advance from t1. When your corporation is focused on wins and not progression your are toxic to the community. therefor, you will not be respected until you progress.
I only have 2 T3 ships and I have more then a handful of screenshots of DYN winning T3 matches…
:dntknw:
I only have 2 T3 ships and I have more then a handful of screenshots of DYN winning T3 matches…
:dntknw:
congrats on those handful of matches
Just to say, you’ve got a very good group cohesion and high efficiency 
But we have recently win some battles because we learn after each match against you, so thanks a lot to you continuing to show a all good image of this game as some others corps (Nasa, Brute, Frog …) :good:
Personally I’m not seeing a huge problem with zerging to top of the ladder in beta. Abuse the mechanics now so that devs see the problem and fix it for release. It’s annoying for the rest of us, but it’s still the way the game is designed. In fact, didn’t they buff zerging recently with the increase of points that “weak” players get for winning over “strong” ones?
Bonus points for reporting it :lol:
Need one of your officers to contact me ASAP, thanks. Preferably in game.
As of this post, DYN and DYN2 are no longer accepting applications on our website. The people who had the ability to accept them have been MIA for some time.
Sorry fo the inconvenience,
MrTwiddlez
Forum Moderator and Officer of Dynamis
sadly MrTwiddlez I think Dynamis is dead
we would love to have you in The United Front which is where most of the active members have moved, let me know if you are interested