I know I’m being a super annoying grammar xxxx right now. And propably wrong.
lol
no no no
If it were worded
“This topic is now closed, to further replies” you would be right.
It is not, and you are wrong, and should feel bad.
lolno
4 hours ago, Elusif said:
no no no
If it were worded
“This topic is now closed, to further replies” you would be right.
It is not, and you are wrong, and should feel bad.
Captain let me explain…
I always have to explain…
I thought it was funny how it could be understood in two ways. No idea if its grammarlely correct. But it sounds wrong. Im an expert on few things and english aint no none of them.
If someone lol’d bcs they found the dual meaning a tad funny, perhaps even chuckle tier, you guys are with me.
Elusif you went full grammar natsi on this one :DI appreciate it though. You did the work and took it a dimension further.
All heil elusif!!
Im actually waiting on (for)a bus and its raining and im bored
If someone has the right answer however i would be interested in the why
at least they didn’t say “with”
[@Slacktivator](< base_url >/index.php?/profile/256407-slacktivator/) Actually, it’s closed TO further replies.
Please be sure you know what you’re talking about in the future.
On 6/10/2017 at 3:55 PM, Shotan said:
[@Slacktivator](< base_url >/index.php?/profile/256407-slacktivator/) Actually, it’s closed TO further replies.
Please be sure you know what you’re talking about in the future.
On 6/9/2017 at 11:26 AM, Elusif said:
no no no
If it were worded
“This topic is now closed, to further replies” you would be right.
It is not, and you are wrong, and should feel bad.
Guys… This was never about correcting grammar. I found it funny how the sentence could be looked at in two ways. That’s all. And I have kind of mentioned it twice in this thread.
It’s barely chuckle-worthy.
Are you guys pranking me?
And I don’t have to know what I’m tai’kin about. This is the internet.