The MM - Mobster Maker! - Present your cases right here!

Game Discussion PvP
#1

Here’s the place where you can present all the evidence that the MM (Matchmaker) is unfair and unbalanced.

It’s time to put the MM - also known as Mobster Maker to bars!

 

What’s required to present?

  • one screenshot during the battle (full format)

  • one screenshot of the statistical screen (full format)

  • any other screenshot of a player that’s having substandard ships of a lesser rank (optional)

  • short description of your view on the situation, along with the conclusive analysis.

 

Screenshots:

oYBFAM4.png

smn0MKx.png

 

Examination of the Player: AlexanderSigma

He had 3 ships of Rank 3 or less. His ships were not even fully synergized - Synergy levels were 2/6 or 3/6.

Let’s check his statistical data.

Analysis: It seems that this player has been inactive for a long time and he’s decided to try to play the game after the break.

HfvGv2N.png               

 

Conclusion:

There is strong evidence that point to some deep and shady connections.

Why? The enemy team had no single player with Rank 3 ships.

From what we have seen here, the goal of the Mobster Maker is not to make balanced matches but seeking ways to make you lose the match, which means it’s not about balance after all.

#2

47 minutes ago, Koromac said:

Here’s the place where you can present all the evidence that the MM (Matchmaker) is unfair and unbalanced.

It’s time to put the MM - also known as Mobster Maker to bars!

 

What’s required to present?

  • one screenshot during the battle (full format)

  • one screenshot of the statistical screen (full format)

  • any other screenshot of a player that’s having substandard ships of a lesser rank (optional)

  • short description of your view on the situation, along with the conclusive analysis.

 

Screenshots:

oYBFAM4.png

smn0MKx.png

 

Examination of the Player: AlexanderSigma

He had 3 ships of Rank 3 or less. His ships were not even fully synergized - Synergy levels were 2/6 or 3/6.

Let’s check his statistical data.

Analysis: It seems that this player has been inactive for a long time and he’s decided to try to play the game after the break.

HfvGv2N.png               

 

Conclusion:

There is strong evidence that point to some deep and shady connections.

Why? The enemy team had no single player with Rank 3 ships.

From what we have seen here, the goal of the Mobster Maker is not to make balanced matches but seeking ways to make you lose the match, which means it’s not about balance after all.

That is your “Strong evidence” of your xxxx being handed to you? That is a looking for an excuse rather than facing a reality. 

 

“Oh I lost! That has to be Matchmakers Fault!”

#3

13 minutes ago, xKostyan said:

That is your “Strong evidence” of your xxxx being handed to you? That is a looking for an excuse rather than facing a reality. 

 

“Oh I lost! That has to be Matchmakers Fault!”

You would have lost the same, it would make no big difference, but of course, a bio-robot like you can’t say that something’s wrong. It’s all fine! Insults are just fine… for a troll like you.

#4

4 minutes ago, Koromac said:

You would have lost the same, it would make no big difference, but of course, a bio-robot like you can’t say that something’s wrong. It’s all fine! Insults are just fine… for a troll like you.

Maybe I would maybe not, you don’t know that, but what I know for a fact that 1 guy in a 8v8 Beacon Hunt ain’t gonna cost you 0-150 score game.

#5

Guys do you think - in general, that the 4 ship slots/docks make it harder for the MM to work properly? Were the former 3 slots a better solution? Maybe only 2 are better? I am unsure

#6

32 minutes ago, avarshina said:

Guys do you think - in general, that the 4 ship slots/docks make it harder for the MM to work properly? Were the former 3 slots a better solution? Maybe only 2 are better? I am unsure

MM does not count your ships

#7

I really like this name 

MOBSTER MAKER  ![:yes_yes_yes:](<fileStore.core_Emoticons>/emoticons/yes_yes_yes.gif “:yes_yes_yes:”)

 

I played yesterday and I feel that some times MM for sure is weird when we have all low rank ships on one side.

But in general yesterday it was ok.

 

Only complain I have is HOT JOINING since I didn’t start single game and was always Hot joining.

It is crap when I’m still waiting to get in game just to see  how bomb is delivered to last becon.

That is same sh it like it was with Captain games when we joined and captain was down already.

 

Remove hot joining and give use Combat Recon back please.  ![:yes_yes_yes:](<fileStore.core_Emoticons>/emoticons/yes_yes_yes.gif “:yes_yes_yes:”)

#8

He has 28 standard ships. So that means he equipped low rank by purpose.  MM doesn’t care what ships you have in que.

#9

18 minutes ago, Rob40468 said:

He has 28 standard ships. 

 That does not mean that he leveled all R3 ships that he have.

#10

3 hours ago, GatoGrande said:

 That does not mean that he leveled all R3 ships that he have.

No, he didn’t. He went full Jericho. Heck, there should be a big banner saying “Max out all your ships to R5 first”.

 

12 hours ago, xKostyan said:

That is your “Strong evidence” of your xxxx being handed to you? That is a looking for an excuse rather than facing a reality. 

Considering that “R3 guy” did more than the engie and covops combined, I have to agree than in this case he wasn’t a culprit here.

#11

11 hours ago, xKostyan said:

MM does not count your ships

 

5 hours ago, Rob40468 said:

He has 28 standard ships. So that means he equipped low rank by purpose.  MM doesn’t care what ships you have in que.

 

}=really? Doesn’t MM at least differentiate between destroyers and other ships in queue, so that not 8-dessy VS 8-randoms setup would occure?

#12

MM knows if you have destroyer equipped or not, but not necessarily using it in a current iteration.

#13

How about this MM 

 

http://prntscr.com/j5y7lz

 

http://prntscr.com/j5y8kv

 

On my side just me with R9-12 all others with R15

 

I guess this is welcome note to new players here  ![:good:](<fileStore.core_Emoticons>/emoticons/good.gif “:good:”)

#14

12 minutes ago, GatoGrande said:

How about this MM 

 

http://prntscr.com/j5y7lz

 

http://prntscr.com/j5y8kv

 

On my side just me with R9-12 all others with R15

 

I guess this is welcome note to new players here  ![:good:](<fileStore.core_Emoticons>/emoticons/good.gif “:good:”)

First one - over a thousand battles, decent w/l ratio, stats showing that he is actually doing something, highest rank 15.

 

The second guy - dunno. If you post  full player table maybe there is someone equally good on the other side. 

 

BTW: throwing some screenshots without checking the players is not doing any help. I was playing devil’s advocate here - if you want someone to pay attention to those, stop throwing screenshots without actually checking the player stats, ok? You have the same access and tools as me, so just go to the schistory.space and check them. Then check those graphs on ITALY’s web tool - I don’t have the link rn. THEN  make the case. Because throwing dozens of screenshots like this will finally just piss people off, not encourage devs to check those games with their proper tools.

#15

26 minutes ago, GatoGrande said:

How about this MM 

 

http://prntscr.com/j5y7lz

 

http://prntscr.com/j5y8kv

 

On my side just me with R9-12 all others with R15

 

I guess this is welcome note to new players here  ![:good:](<fileStore.core_Emoticons>/emoticons/good.gif “:good:”)

how about, instead of cherry picking, you provide a statistical slice? how about this? 

#16

1 minute ago, xKostyan said:

how about, instead of cherry picking, you provide a statistical slice? how about this? 

 

I played just two games today since I’m forced to farm some equipment. ![:alien3:](<fileStore.core_Emoticons>/emoticons/alien3.png “:alien3:”)

One was this and other was not much better since two Orelius gunships with focusing lasers rape enemy team.

 

I did play yesterday and it was much more balanced, but that was yesterday and this is today  ![:dntknw:](<fileStore.core_Emoticons>/emoticons/dntknw.gif “:dntknw:”)

#17

2 hours ago, xKostyan said:

how about, instead of cherry picking, you provide a statistical slice? how about this? 

you just volunteered Kosty ![:good:](<fileStore.core_Emoticons>/emoticons/good.gif “:good:”)

#18

7 minutes ago, avarshina said:

you just volunteered Kosty ![:good:](<fileStore.core_Emoticons>/emoticons/good.gif “:good:”)

Considering I did not have time to play for past 2 months, and very short on time now, I think I am doing fine for a Ace I am

http://schistory.space/userinfo.php?nickname=xKostyan

#19

I would like to say here that MM is better but it isn’t

it is not even close to good or even games.

 

hhttp://prntscr.com/j84bbn

http://prntscr.com/j84bbn

 

And this was first game today, yesterday was same.

It looks like I always get Russian server even if I’m not Russian and on opposite site have all good Russians.

 

http://prntscr.com/j84c62

 

 

#20

2 hours ago, GatoGrande said:

I would like to say here that MM is better but it isn’t

it is not even close to good or even games.

 

hhttp://prntscr.com/j84bbn

http://prntscr.com/j84bbn

 

And this was first game today, yesterday was same.

It looks like I always get Russian server even if I’m not Russian and on opposite site have all good Russians.

 

http://prntscr.com/j84c62

 

 

Somehow your complaints mostly sound like: “Mimimi, I can’t farm noøbs with my Nyx as it used to be”.

Judging by your stats you are used to be in uneven battles, just mostly on the winner site. Now that you only won ~54% of the PvP battles this month you start whining that the mm is so unfair and that you only loose battles which is just not the truth, mayBe you should create a new account if anything that you want is farming noøbs.