I wrote a post in Q / A section, a post consisting of 35 more or less fair questions. All involved parties verified them.
Now that you removed/censored those questions, you just confirmed one thing, but you did not eliminate the problem, you just buried it.
Those questions were produced as a result of communication between many corporation members from other corporations who wanted to get some answers.
I just helped them. Again, those were not only my questions, it was a combined effort to post such questions. There was no reason not to include them in the October Q / A thread.
By doing so, you also started to undermine your own credibility and sabotage your own project, by your own doing. That was not my intention nor my wish.
You affected many others, whose voice you now censored or erased!
You only confirmed the suspicion that others did not yet had, but have it now, or they will, once they learn of your action.
Discrimination/Censorship against your own (paying) community is something that a good company should never stand for!
I think its the typical actio <> reactio model in a situation of alienation of involved parties (not very smart).
An other way to go – and avoid things like this happening – may could be to encourage those players to get in to the forum and make posts/reports themselves! Maybe it was just an absurd bit too much  for one post and for one person  ?