so 23 to 2 cst, 2 to 11 cst, 11 to 14, 14 to 23 cst?? is that correct?
Sorry for that… let me check this info.
Yes, it seems correct.
For me that would limit me to being asleep or at work. Given the current times it would be impossible for most Americans to play SecCon outside of weekends and holidays. I do like the big blue disclaimer, since I imagine you know there will be flaws from the start. Americans would need a fighting slot between 3 MSK and 9 MSK, which would be American evenings.
Ouch. no. You fell in that “exchange-trap”, its a bad translation, it only works GS->Creds not Creds->GS.
And tbh. the prices are hilarious! 2500 GS for 1Mio credits… who would ever buy that?!?
T1 players might. In the T1 grind, that exchange looks understandable, but 500GS is equal to one unlicensed T4 PvE.
No synergy = No players
Most battles would probably be imbalanced and not a fair fight. A T5 squad vs T2 shouldn’t really help the T5 squad get synergy. Considering it’ll still give credits, and capturing sectors can give a lot of credits, artifacts, and GS to the whole corp, the only thing it’s missing is loyalty. The thing is, loyalty is the one thing that makes the most sense. WX-30 would give 42 artifacts to each member of the entire corp!
I’m not understanding the resetting of sectors. Right now each race has 9 bordering sectors, yet many of the resets are more than 9. Won’t that lead to a stalemate where sectors are unavailable to conquer?
Combat interface
Added the option to select the position of direction markers
Default setting - in the middle (as it is now)
At the edge of the aim ellipsis
At the edge of the screen
I tested the aim ellipsis, and it’s a little awkward for me. The default setting at 1366x768, i.e. standard laptop resolution, puts the markings above the buf/debuf list or inside the active module area.
Can an option be added to make it all smaller like before the hud changes?