The main basic thing bothering me, that still isn’t addressed, which only shows one thing.
That developers don’t read or rather listen to the Community here, despite being told multiple times how to handle certain things.
I agree, interface changes must happen, with better functionality. Current functionality is limited in terms of helping the user.
Many things could be added to clarify the users how to handle their setups.
Well, to get to the point…
I tested something for one match.
Picked up 4 of my ships, erased my implant setup, erased my ship slots on all 4 ships.
Went into battle without any problems. No notifications about any of this. No warnings, no nothing. Instead of doing that, it’s the same old system, with limited and lacking functions!
Use common sense!
This shouldn’t be allowed to happen!
People should equip all 3-4 of their slots, especially in higher tiers, or at least when reaching certain rank…
Then it gets even worse. I played with 3 rank 15 ships along with 1 rank 14 Destroyer. I saw a rank 8 Destroyer in a T5 battle! How and why?
Going to 3 tier categories after 4 years is just plain stupid.
Another case:
We got the enemy team, who had 3-4 ships on their side, but on our side, there were 2 persons, who had only one ship at synergy level 1 and it was Capture the Beacons match… And the rank difference is horrible! Rank 8 vs. rank 15!
I won’t discuss this any further. This mess got 5 times worse than ever before. Sure, the Matchmaker wasn’t perfect, but at least it was somewhat (generally speaking) within “normal” parameters.
People are telling me, if you won’t change this to a previous state, they simply won’t play your game anymore. I agree with them.
You did one step forward, and two steps back with this move. Again!
About the bonuses:
They do not belong there. It feels like a cheat mode for the incompetent.
How can a lower ranked ships get higher resistance and damage than the ships of the highest rank? This helping tool is a mess and it should be removed!
Why helping rookies?
Did people complained so much that you had to give them that as well? The only reason why I liked playing this game was simple.
It provided a challenge and it was more fun for me as well.
But now, it’s not fun anymore. It’s annoying. Why should I fly lower ranks of ships, when I can use the higher ones? You said so yourself, that veterans should stick to the higher tiers, leaving lower tiers alone. That also confirms your move with the loyalty system. All contracts only work with rank 13-15 and NOT lower.
Teach them how to play, they are not in diapers! They can think, at least they should try! You totally dumbed down the game! I spoke to Russians.
They are furious and angry about this as well.
As usual, you will most likely ignore any feedback given, without resorting to really necessary and needed adjustments.
I already wrote so many suggestions about interface and the MM balance.
Just browse a bit, some of my suggestions are actually useful.
This isn’t a suggestion, but just a general idea:
You SHOULD consider improving the Matchmaker by adding additional parameters and notifications.
-
Implant notifications (all active implants to match the highest ship that is in use)
-
ship slot notifications (if not fully slotted in all 4 slots)
-
equipment notifications (all ships must be fully equipped)
-
ammunition and missile notifications (if not equipped)
If you miss any of those things, you can just display a warning, or notify player that he should adjust some of the setups, otherwise he can’t queue for battle.
Destroyers:
Leagues should be left alone, but when it comes to PvP, limit destroyers per only 2 on each side max.
(which presents some challenges, how to determine a Destroyer player, if others already took it)
Destroyers in PvP mode should be only usable once (once they are destroyed, they should no longer be able to spawn).
You need to determine if this will apply only to certain numbers of players, especially since now we have join-in-progress MM.
Generally speaking, I would fully revert to a previous state, made some necessary adjustments and additions, like described above, only then I would consider something else.
Hopefully, you will understand that this way of going with the MM system is a wrong one