Only a few corps had such gear, I am a rank 11 player with 4 mk1/2 fit tier 4 rank 10 ships, doesn’t mean I get Rolf-stomped at tier 4. And I can agree pushing players to higher tiers with higher repair costs can seem unfair, but it is better than full purple players at tier 2 dominating.
Actually my fully Purple/Blue T2 Ship is still open to get rofl stomped. And gl with your mk1 T4 ship against that t1 overthere, ohwait nvm he’s totally got this.
Not really, no. The game is incomplete. If you are willing to pay for an incomplete game without realizing what you are getting into, that is YOUR problem, not the dev’s problem. It is in beta, and holds the right of being called a beta. If you don’t trust it, don’t pay for it. It isn’t that hard 
But this game has a lot of potential for change, so nonetheless, wait and see. And don’t pay for it till it is officially minted as a fully finished product (unless your trusting or have money to spend and don’t care or whatever).
I love the way you read all of Aptests post and contributed to all his salient points without in any way shape or form latching on to a cash related statement.
Yes it’s a beta and so is Warthunder and they will be for ages. (inserrt tin foil hat comments here) But if Aptest is like me in any way I wanted to contribute to the development of the game I saw which was heading in a direction I could physically, and monetarily “get behind” And now I very much can’t.
I have a licence I have a pack, I am still validly able as a paying customer to vote with my wallet by not sinking further funds into the game.
Your inability to understand that sir is YOUR problem.
I love the way you read all of Aptests post and contributed to all his salient points without in any way shape or form latching on to a cash related statement.
Yes I didn’t read all of his posts. No, this doesn’t mean I can’t make a comment on one specific portion of his post. Also I didn’t “latch onto” a cash related statement, I actually latched onto a statement about the beta not being allowed to be a beta because someone thought they had some right to have the game treated like a full game simply because they don’t understand they payed for a beta, not a full game (to summarize, with possible inaccuracy, you get my point).
the moment the first euro changes hands the developers lose all beta privileges.
This argument can actually be argued on its own, and I did argue it not taking into consideration the rest of his argument because it wasn’t necessary for the particular point I wanted to make. Maybe the rest of his argument is valid, I wouldn’t know I didn’t read it, but that part of it I disagreed with, and so I disagreed with it specifically.
This argument can actually be argued on its own, and I did argue it not taking into consideration the rest of his argument because it wasn’t necessary for the particular point I wanted to make. Maybe the rest of his argument is valid, I wouldn’t know I didn’t read it, but that part of it I disagreed with, and so I disagreed with it specifically.
+1
In the sense that I’ve made two different arguments. One of them is “the game is not a beta, rather it is a released game that is still being developed”.
Not really, no. The game is incomplete. If you are willing to pay for an incomplete game without realizing what you are getting into, that is YOUR problem, not the dev’s problem. It is in beta, and holds the right of being called a beta. If you don’t trust it, don’t pay for it. It isn’t that hard But this game has a lot of potential for change, so nonetheless, wait and see. And don’t pay for it till it is officially minted as a fully finished product (unless your trusting or have money to spend and don’t care or whatever).
No no. You misunderstood.
The game is beta. ok. Yet devs want us to pay to support it.
Ok, i’ll pay, if you give me what i want (in this case, if you progress the game in the way i want it to progress). You won’t? I won’t pay than. Simple as that.
We are only raging because they have no subtlety in their blatant money grabbing, while they could have had a gem among the games, in which people would invest far more money…
Yes I didn’t read all of his posts. No, this doesn’t mean I can’t make a comment on one specific portion of his post. Also I didn’t “latch onto” a cash related statement, I actually latched onto a statement about the beta not being allowed to be a beta because someone thought they had some right to have the game treated like a full game simply because they don’t understand they payed for a beta, not a full game (to summarize, with possible inaccuracy, you get my point).
This argument can actually be argued on its own, and I did argue it not taking into consideration the rest of his argument because it wasn’t necessary for the particular point I wanted to make. Maybe the rest of his argument is valid, I wouldn’t know I didn’t read it, but that part of it I disagreed with, and so I disagreed with it specifically.
Actually your correct I’ve shot the gun there somewhat, so my apologies. I usually do a better job of not posting when my bloods boiling.