No, debuggers always say “what the @#*% is wrong with this code!?”
You must be playing on extremely low resolution then, cuz the number of pixels between your shot and the ball is probably more like 20-50, depending on the range
Lowest resolution=easier to hit targets and more fps 
Lowest resolution=easier to hit targets and more fps
This guy gets it. 
Lowest resolution=easier to hit targets and more fps
Low res also makes this game xxxx to look at. I prefer looking at a nice screen instead of a bunch of pixels. After all, I do play this for fun.
leading indicator would be great. however its absence also adds to the weapon being hard to use, with all its versatility, so i fear if it gets that leading reticle, people will cry for nerfs
the bigger hitboxes might also allow you to hit targets better; i cant really confirm it yet, but i believe dirk is right; making them smaller would mean, your combo shot would be harder to do. the limitations, especially on the giant new map with its terrible terrain hitboxes, are hard to cope with, but maybe the bubbles could have a larger halo around them to actually fill the hitboxes;
generally the phaser is quite dangerous, especially against ceptors, and many pilots are still adjusting to it. having both positron and bubblegun experience makes it really cool; the really hard to do combo shots are a big bonus and it should not be easy to do them (defies their point), anyway against a single target, the bubble can do more damage if it crits, than the comboblast.
Low res also makes this game xxxx to look at. I prefer looking at a nice screen instead of a bunch of pixels. After all, I do play this for fun.
I play in 1080p res, and I agree with you.
Anyway it is not like I have problems hitting stuff. It is all about DPI in your mouse, and sensitivity.
I play in 1080p res, and I agree with you.
Anyway it is not like I have problems hitting stuff. It is all about DPI in your mouse, and sensitivity.
Exactly
I play in 1440p res and I can aim just fine. Just gotta use ur mouse a lot and figure out what sensitivity/DPI works best for you.
No one saying you can not, point is it is way easier to aim in low res
I think we’ve gotten thoroughly off-topic now. I personally use 1080, tho. Used to have a crappy tiny monitor but it got tiring. Xp
No one saying you can not, point is it is way easier to aim in low res
But when u say low res, what’s it exactely about? kind of 1280x720…?
I think your videos are all full hd
But when u say low res, what’s it exactely about? kind of 1280x720…?
I think your videos are all full hd
by low res I mean ~800x600 or 1024x78 and mid-low video settings, that is a “competitive setup” for mosot shooter games.
I never said I do that, I like eye candy, so i try to get highest possible graphics.
by low res I mean ~800x600 or 1024x78 and mid-low video settings, that is a “competitive setup” for mosot shooter games.
I never said I do that, I like eye candy, so i try to get highest possible graphics.
Same here then :012j:
No one saying you can not, point is it is way easier to aim in low res
I’m well aware it’s easier to aim with lower res, I just personally find low-res ugly to look at.
I’m well aware it’s easier to aim with lower res, I just personally find low-res ugly to look at.
Real gamers play in 8 bit. Crisis took a lot of modding, let me tell you!
Real gamers are actually playing a game instead of being on the forums spreading their opinion.
#hypocrite
Real gamers are actually playing a game instead of being on the forums spreading their opinion.
#hypocrite
If only the game had mechanics detailing how long it’s been since each player was last online…