8 hours ago, soked said:
We would understand if you came up with the “new schedule” in the first place and showed us that it would take, say, 90 days to gather enough Electrum to build a destroyer but when you do it like this, announcing something proudly and then reducing it to half, I can’t find the good will under that decision.
315 got down to 275. Its 40 electrum less (3,3333 refined electrum).
8 hours ago, Koromac said:
P2W also means another thing. If you can only get something in the Store, which isn’t available by any other means.
In this case, some of the rare resources.
By that definition you are including cosmetics and other visual perks that have no performance impact in gameplay. You must add the part of the advantage to make it P2W. Getting resources others cant get is P2W, but remember, SC has always added missions as only mean to get resources (fast) and then open other ways to obtain them.
5 hours ago, AnunnakiHunters said:
sorry but koromac is right.i think. existing p2w definition is according to what he described in my view.
did you ever argument against wht devs or gajin told swifter ? am not sure as i am not often in Forum but till now i saw you always supporting them. this is ok as no crime but throws a bad light on your activity here in my view. a discussion board populated with “yes” tellers makes not much sense. Only the exchange of opinions that differ is worth a discussion. If other opinions(which are correctly and detailed worked out) are always downed cause they differ from the devs or gaijins meaning i have to ask me wht all this here is?. remembers me a box fights in which the winner is already announced before the battle ends. has not much use for me as such Forums should be the way to communicate with devs and not a place to let down own meaning cause always same tell contrary of what is intended… now i understand why the Forum is not really well populated. ist no “real” discussion board as discussions and ohter meaning are not wanted.
This is again only my personal meaning and not eternal truth for all. not intended by me to discredit anyone. is to Point out why many hesitate to tell here wht they really believe in and wht they think. a communication channel to devs and Publisher should be used as such. not only as Auto Applause platform for all what is introduced and done in game.
I agree devs dont answer all thats placed over the table (because they dont understand, cant talk about it, its a complex matter, only comes from a small portion of the player base, etc), but there are big discussion instances in the community itself, some of them have big influence over SC course. And of course devs always have the last words since they are who have most power (they take the desitions, implement changes, etc)…you can tell your neightbour to change the painting of his house, but he is the only one who (legally) can, since he owns it and you dont. In an organization as this, money and hierarchy are aspects you cant ignore. Nevertheless, you can still argue on ideas against the dev team…and make a change through it (if properly argumented and done politely). I often show some of my ideas that are against SC and some of them are heard. SC is made of humans, so theres always room for mistakes and corrections.