Just a quick idea for the toplist on the website, maybe players with less than 100-150 games should be excluded from the list to make it not-so-skewed in some stats like Victory%, Avg Eff and some others?
http://star-conflict.com/en/ratings/
I’m basicly #1 in Avg. Eff right now if you don’t count the 10-20 game nubs above me with my 1554.3 Avg Efficiency and next “real” player at 1488.5 basicly.
Avg. Eff, Hit Ratio, Average Kills, Kill Ratio and Win Ratio all are greatly affected by players that might have only played 10-20 games total.
Bumping this up for hopefully fixed ratings soon as they seem to be updating constantly now 
+1 yea lets kick the 10-20 games nubs that have CRAZY efficiency for lvl 1 fights. i mean having all lvl2 fights is the only way ratting should count anyway. maybe if we kick those peeps my 1450+ will be top 10!
but as for the “issue”. avg is avg. regardless of how many fights. weather or not its a good “measure” or not is a different point. why not just make a new account win 10/10 games and then you can have bragging rights.
since being 3rd=1rst now. cuz they aint real scores.
or just keep grinding t2 games and get higher. if they only have 10-20 games then you should beat their score easy. after all they are “nubs”.
*edit* had to bold my stats for extra effect.
edit2* bold got a little out of hand.
+1 yea lets kick the 10-20 games nubs that have CRAZY efficiency for lvl 1 fights. i mean having all lvl2 fights is the only way ratting should count anyway. maybe if we kick those peeps my 1450+ will be top 10!
but as for the “issue”. avg is avg. regardless of how many fights. weather or not its a good “measure” or not is a different point. why not just make a new account win 10/10 games and then you can have bragging rights.
since being 3rd=1rst now. cuz they aint real scores.
or just keep grinding t2 games and get higher. if they only have 10-20 games then you should beat their score easy. after all they are “nubs”.
*edit* had to bold my stats for extra effect.
edit2* bold got a little out of hand.
I got no words 
You just brought the word “butthurt” to a whole new level.
Even limiting the rating lists to players with atleast 50 games would solve a lot of things but 100-150 is propably a lot better to get even a remote idea of their actual skill, some stats just don’t work for players that have only played 10-20 games.
But what does the weather have got to do with any of this? The weather is pretty fine here atleast, not cold at all and was sunny all day.
Lol, some low rank scrub smacking top 1 player, hilarious.