^ This.
If you read carefully, Uhmari has given everyone the -key- to why this entire issue has started… Eve - Band of Brothers. Apparently unsatisfied with the current offering of entertainment in SC, he’s taken to trying to inject Eve’s meta-game espionage rediculousness. I’ll give him points for trying to drum up interest in it by creating both the problem and the supposed cure via some form of psuedo education on the issue.
Beyond spectating for entertainment, I simply can’t be bothered. I would however love to thank Uhmari for his antics in general chat today. Was rather hilarious to watch him trying to drum up interest in his -debacle-. It’s telling if your audience has been reduced to telling -General Chat- players about your implanted alts in DYN, and how you’ll destroy it. I nearly fell out of my seat laughing when a random player fired back a remark about how “sad” it was for EVO to push for publicity in this way. I say carry on Uhmari, as your definitely getting publicity. However this isn’t Hollywood, an I’m not sure that it’s going to benefit you in the end. If your truely missing “going where we want when we want” then head on back to Eve an let general populace know to get out of your way. I’ll bring some popcorn for that…
We surpassed NASA by 90,000 points, and DYN dropped 20k points in less than two days.
We surpassed NASA by 90,000 points
you now have more members than NASA.
and DYN dropped 20k points in less than two days.
For corp who have 300k+ rating gaining or losing 20k isn’t anything special - just a regular fluctuation.
you now have more members than NASA.
For corp who have 300k+ rating gaining or losing 20k isn’t anything special - just a regular fluctuation.
Wait and see…
NASA does better proportionally with less players…if a group of 300 Spartans can beat hundreds of thousands of there enemys then those with the superior skill will always win, the numbers are just a external factor.
If your so focused on beating us face to face, beg the devs to put in Corp battles
Why is it that after I left Nasa we surpassed them in the leaderboard? Why is it since I left DYN2, DYN has been dropping? Huh?
This doesn’t even make sense — DYN2’s statistics have nothing to do with DYN’s success in Sector Conquest, as they are separate corporations.
NASA getting into the top three was the result of a small group of players within NASA aggressively pursuing sector control when it first came out. They sort of rallied the rest of the corporation and it was pretty awesome.
Now that we understand the way sector control works, we decided to just wait and see what they do to balance it.
Our main issue is that it does not reward us to try to fight for sectors in large groups, as the matching making system usually puts one NASA squad against another. We would really just prefer the queue to filter the teams by faction. We are tired of Jericho and Federation being on our teams, and us having to fight against other Empire corporations.
Some players have had exams and others have cut back on the amount of hours they are spending in game right now.
Our recruiting practices are different than that of EVO’s, so we grow slower.
We don’t require players to play a certain amount of time each week, so we fell in the rankings.
Our roster thinning is not the result of us being spied on, but a regular trimming of inactive members.
As you can see, none of why NASA slipped in the rankings has had anything to do with you.
You are trying to justify your ridiculous behavior and failing. All this talk of spying and you cannot even gather accurate intelligence.
Do you want me to just send you a state of NASA e-mail each week?
NASA getting into the top three was the result of a small group of players within NASA aggressively pursuing sector control when it first came out. They sort of rallied the rest of the corporation and it was pretty awesome.
Now that we understand the way sector control works, we decided to just wait and see what they do to balance it.
Our main issue is that it does not reward us to try to fight for sectors in large groups, as the matching making system usually puts one NASA squad against another. We would really just prefer the queue to filter the teams by faction. We are tired of Jericho and Federation being on our teams, and us having to fight against other Empire corporations.
Some players have had exams and others have cut back on the amount of hours they are spending in game right now.
Our recruiting practices are different than that of EVO’s, so we grow slower.
We don’t require players to play a certain amount of time each week, so we fell in the rankings.
Our roster thinning is not the result of us being spied on, but a regular trimming of inactive members.
As you can see, none of why NASA slipped in the rankings have had anything to do with you.
You are trying to justify your ridiculous behavior and failing. All this talk of spying and you cannot even gather accurate intelligence.
Do you want me to just send you a state of NASA e-mail each week?
excuses excuses excuses…
This doesn’t even make sense — DYN2’s statistics have nothing to do with DYN’s success in Sector Conquest, as they are separate corporations.
Its more than you know…
Its more than you know…
Actually Parakeet would probably have way more credibility than you when it came to it.
NASA if you are so legit then why not show us? Surpass us!
Which means what exactly?
It means that because you are a member of DYN saying a DYN member is better than an EVO member is easily susceptible to bias. Don’t get me wrong though, Intricate saying EVO will kick all your asses and the NASA guys saying NASA will kick all our asses is equally biased 
I do not believe I ever said anything of the sort…
It means that because you are a member of DYN saying a DYN member is better than an EVO member is easily susceptible to bias. Don’t get me wrong though, Intricate saying EVO will kick all your asses and the NASA guys saying NASA will kick all our asses is equally biased
^ That
Every loyal corp member will say his corp will kick xxxx.
I do not believe I ever said anything of the sort…
No but the logic remains, you said a fellow corp member was more trustworthy than someone else, which is susceptible to bias, or at least likely to be viewed as such by people in other corps.
No but the logic remains, you said a fellow corp member was more trustworthy than someone else, which is susceptible to bias, or at least likely to be viewed as such by people in other corps.
Except that the original post I was commenting on wasn’t an opinion like “DYN will win Sector Conquest” but on erroneous facts presented by Intricate. He basically said that because he left DYN2, DYN was now dropping in ranking.
I pointed out that this logic was fallacious in that no matter how much he had contributed to DYN2, he couldn’t have had any impact on DYN’s Sector Conquest rankings. Thus, his assertion that DYN’s losing 20k points in the last few days was in some way related to his leaving DYN2 is incorrect.
Except that the original post I was commenting on wasn’t an opinion like “DYN will win Sector Conquest” but on erroneous facts presented by Intricate. He basically said that because he left DYN2, DYN was now dropping in ranking.
I pointed out that this logic was fallacious in that no matter how much he had contributed to DYN2, he couldn’t have had any impact on DYN’s Sector Conquest rankings. Thus, his assertion that DYN’s losing 20k points in the last few days was in some way related to his leaving DYN2 is incorrect.
tsk tsk tsk, “when I left” is an implication as to what I did/stole…
Except that the original post I was commenting on wasn’t an opinion like “DYN will win Sector Conquest” but on erroneous facts presented by Intricate. He basically said that because he left DYN2, DYN was now dropping in ranking.
I pointed out that this logic was fallacious in that no matter how much he had contributed to DYN2, he couldn’t have had any impact on DYN’s Sector Conquest rankings. Thus, his assertion that DYN’s losing 20k points in the last few days was in some way related to his leaving DYN2 is incorrect.
In this case why is he talking about your credibility then, that is still a biased statement. Your logic is fine though, be he pointed to your credibility which is susceptible to bias, not your logic, which is not