Thank you for the link and invite Orca. As I said in the PMs between you and I, I will give my views, concerns and opinions of this.
As I eluded to then to you, both you and I are on the same page in our thinking of something such as this. As you know I am no stranger to both small and large SC Corporations (SCC), having served in both as member, Officers, VPs and now CEO of the Vanatori.
It was just last week that I send out one of my Envoys to begin talks of Alliances with other SCCs. During that process I recognized the need for a place where two or more SCCs could gather without breaching each others home turfs. Example of this would be warring corporations ready to talk some form of ceasefire but neither will come to the others in-house tables to even begin talks. My VP at the time jumped the gun and created a new discord as a sort of Neutral Ground place where envoys of both sides could come to and not have to cross into the others property. The thought was there but the idea was short lived by my standards.
1. The server was set up by him, a Vanatori and even if given full rights to others, it would always be a Vanatori site in some CEOs minds. If someone was in dispute with us, and we say come to the neutral ground, they still may not due to the original builders. That can have negative effects on any form of Pact making or Open Talks. Also, our corporate discord already has a generic form of round table where others can come and visit, as non members, Invited Guests or Allies. So a new discord doing the same thing seemed to me as a duplication of something that our corporation already had erected internally. Having it viewed as a Vanatori Own place would make no difference to some CEOs. Corporate CEOs and Envoys have to feel that a neutral meeting place is just that neutral. I closed up the idea with my VP at the time and sent him off to do the Envoy task that was requested to the prospective corporation at the time.
- Some corporations will not ever come to consensus with ideas other come up with if it is not their own to begin with. You will never get those types to this form of table.
3 Accord Alliances, which is what Im thinking this being presented are not Pacts. Pacts are Agreement between two corporations to do or not do things that are mutually beneficial in some form or another to both Pact Signers. An Accord Alliance is broader. Its more in line with what the United Nations does with all the countries then Treaties made between a few. NATO is also an Accord, so is OPEC. They are like minded nations or corporations that agree (come to an accord, agreement) to abide by whatever guidelines are ratified by all the parties. So for this, any SCC that wishes to be in the Accord, first has to agree to whatever guidelines are drafted up and put into place. Which leads right into number four.
4. Founding SCCs and the Foundations of the Accord. If this is to ever occur, based on past and real life experience myself, there must be at least two layers of the Accord. The Founding Members (think in terms of UN 7 base members) that come up with the initial guidelines, ratify them into agreement and then as an Accord grows, they bring in new like minded SCCs and even amend the guidelines. We are talking a Living, Entity. Something that is never static and grows and shrinks and changes over time based on all the issues that make it come into being and live while it exists.
***
CONCERNS -
One of my primary concerns is what is described above. No one person, party or SC Corporation can be the Oversight Entity. An Oversight Committee, maybe, even a yes, if its done properly. Reason is, if done in the singular, that one Entity can have devastating effects on the entire Accord. Examples are, actual death of one person holding all the keys to the place and no one can do anything more after that day. Another is trolling and alternative actions by one or more parties holding the keys and effecting the others due to ingame or personal vendettas.
Everyone can think of something along these lines just as your reading the examples. A form of stopgap has to be thought out as much as possible (again its a constantly changing limb withing the entire Accord body structure) and thought out in a way that just the foundation parties agree on.
Another concern of mine personally is that if Im in game and I see a pilot from a corporation that I know is an Accord Member, that should not prevent me from going after that pilot if I have to for some task. His corporation may be an Accord member, but my own corporation has no Alliance Pact with his Corporation. An Accord is not a Pact. Those are done one on one between corporations, not in an Accord. Accords are places where the Management Teams can come to, gather, work things out and come up with ideas to resolve even the disputes among the member SCCs.
And that brings us right back to the actual creations of the Accord. Will founding SCCs attempt to govern over member SCCs? Will one party feel they have some type of authority over any other member party? Accords do work but getting them up and running in manors I envision or that any one else envisions them that are reading this is a tricky matter.
Another concern is… were discussing small SCCs. What if an Accord does work and a small SCC grows and is larger? Are they kicked out just because they no longer meet some preset number? I would always vote NO and even vote NO for even having something like that instituted in the first place. Size of an Accord should never matter for membership. What matters is if the member SCC complies with whatever Oversights are in place and guidelines of the Accord. Small or Large, its Compliance that really matters.
***
VIEWS.
Yes. Its possible to implement in Star Conflict. We are talking about something that is external of the actual game logic. The modern word for what is being proposed is the META GAME, not the actual game. Meta are entire entities that arise from physical games played all over. Metas can even shape and steer a game and the creators into paths and ideas they themselves never even conceived. So yes, my view is it could work, Ive see it, I have even been on the coding side in software of products where massive changes are made to the product in support of something that came about from the meta side of the product, not the product designers.
If this is the view of others too, then were on the path to meta formation and Foundation forming of a meta Accord Alliance. But Ill put it out there right now, such an entity will never run the Vanatori or make decisions for them. Give all the input pro and cons and examples and insight ya want if a member but what the Vanatori do with it is decided by us and us alone and in the case where internally there is an impasse, that final say so rests on my shoulders as their CEO. I would expect the same from any other Accord member. Take whats offered from Accord members but we will not make attempts to manage for you or even judge you for the final decisions you do within your own Corporation.
Vu