garlic
I agree
I am surprised so many people are satisfied with the MM. That approval number is pretty impressive, actually.
garlic
That is a perfect first post 
I agree entirely with you.
Welcome to the forum!!
I guess a lot of beginners are choosing their favorite ship class based on the special module the ship offers.
And to be honest the Special Module of ECMs is not very useful for beginners, so i understand the low number of players which like their ECMs the most.
Tacklers have an awesome Special Module, and Engineers have Auras. Everyone loves Auras. Anygame Anytime.
Re: recons, I think it also heavily depends on which specific ship you are flying. In T3, there is no f2p r9 recon (which is a shame, imo).
If you are in t5 you see all the camo lrfs killing stuff bit in lower tiers people probably think they are boring and sit at spawn sniping, and hate it when some one blows them up. Or perhaps you get the cov ops pilots like lrf as their second ship
Flying a new Kite build, I feel it is still very playable but obviously more challenging. One suggestion would be how about making the special module of each class selectable from 2 or so choices? Specifically for the CovOps, I would like Orion to replace Plasma Web on my build, and then discard Plasma Web to free up an active slot for something else. We see with LRF there are already two choices, anyone else see the value in this?
Thanks for the EU and RU result ratio, I really appreciate.
Anyway if the result is not just a dream what the devs draw, this show me something else.
The text results seems a clear propaganda. That part is easy to manipulate.
At the end I found a nice video what is really fit for this topic.
The text results seems a clear propaganda. That part is easy to manipulate.
Why do you think that we want to deceive you? :fed001:
Text results show the main tendencies from answers, and they are not all positive.
Why do you think that we want to deceive you? :fed001:
Text results show the main tendencies from answers, and they are not all positive.
Seems all the negative results get removed. I just read it again… nvm seems all good, all charts going up, everything is awesome.
The game is do well, the only thing what you have to do is mix the tiers, buff the invasion.
Ohh and add a LOT of new content. We need it so much.
Seems all the negative results get removed. I just read it again… nvm seems all good, all charts going up, everything is awesome.
The game is do well, the only thing what you have to do is mix the tiers, buff the invasion.
Ohh and add a LOT of new content. We need it so much.
Seems all the negative results get removed. I just read it again… nvm seems all good, all charts going up, everything is awesome.
The game is do well, the only thing what you have to do is mix the tiers, buff the invasion.
Ohh and add a LOT of new content. We need it so much.
Actually, mixing tiers will be great for the balance in pvp, and buffing invasion will do wonders for the player population, since most players play PvE or invasion.
So even if you wanted to be sarcastic, your points are really valid, even if you don’t like them.
Seems all the negative results get removed.
Probably you are a huge fan of conspiracy theories ^_^
Probably you are a huge fan of conspiracy theories
Even Star Conflict has a “secret society” of conspiracy theorists
Probably you are a huge fan of conspiracy theories ^_^
Ilerminaty
Actually, mixing tiers will be great for the balance in pvp, and buffing invasion will do wonders for the player population, since most players play PvE or invasion.
So even if you wanted to be sarcastic, your points are really valid, even if you don’t like them.
Probably you have right about invasion and pve. About the mixed tiers, they failed with it 3 times. If they would like to mix them, they need to rework the tiers, maybe remove the tiers totally. They are leaking in the higher tiers, losing the old payers.
Probably you are a huge fan of conspiracy theories ^_^
Haha, I believe in numbers, because I’m a skeptical.
We don’t have clear numbers here.
We have no idea, how many surveys did you received.
Still not aggregated the RU and EU surveys (doesn’t matter since there us is no question about population between countries so no reason to hide data.)
This survey is a joke, the result is the same.
I’ll be happy when these charts will show an up going tendency.
http://steamcharts.com/app/212070#7d
http://steamcharts.com/cmp/212070,236390,301520#1y (Don’t forget you are with the green line on the bottom)
Probably you have right about invasion and pve. About the mixed tiers, they failed with it 3 times. If they would like to mix them, they need to rework the tiers, maybe remove the tiers totally. They are leaking in the higher tiers, losing the old payers.
Haha, I believe in numbers, because I’m a skeptical.
We don’t have clear numbers here.
We have no idea, how many surveys did you received.
Still not aggregated the RU and EU surveys (doesn’t matter since there us is no question about population between countries so no reason to hide data.)
This survey is a joke, the result is the same.
I’ll be happy when these charts will show an up going tendency.
http://steamcharts.com/app/212070#7d
http://steamcharts.com/cmp/212070,236390,301520#1y (Don’t forget you are with the green line on the bottom)
To be honest, losing old players is good. Games will be more balanced if I weren’t playing on them.
But really the problem is that their implementation of mixed tiers is flawed, not that the idea is bad. As you said, they should remove tiers completely, and just work on ranks. Or keep tiers as a reference, but play only with ranks.
So let’s say you have a hangar layout and your maximum ship is rank 10. Then you can play in a game with people with top rank 12, 11 or 10. So essentially you will have a +2-2 rank bracket to play against. That way you can either be top rank or bottom rank, and that will mean that even the hated rank 4-rank 7 and rank 10 will be top rank sometimes, and you will have opportunities to level them.
As it is now, if I play with rank 9 ships, I will ALWAYS be top rank, so I will have a de facto advantage over people with rank 7 and rank 8 ships.
With the system I propose, playing rank 9 could also mean that you are bottom rank vs rank 11 ships. That way people would be encouraged to keep progressing, instead of staying in rank 9.
Because the jump from rank 9 to rank 10 is abysmal. In rank 12 to rank 13 the jump is almost non existent, because a rank 12 ship is as good or even better than some other rank 15 ships.
Probably you are a huge fan of conspiracy theories ^_^
Hmm, classy.
Somebody should remind you that he is a customer…
If you want to give edgy answers, i suggest you back up your claims and methods of surveying before making fun of your customer.
Hmm, classy.
Somebody should remind you that he is a customer…
If you want to give edgy answers, i suggest you back up your claims and methods of surveying before making fun of your customer.
I already bought all the DLCs and I have almos all the ships. I’m worthless. 
Hmm, classy.
Somebody should remind you that he is a customer…
If you want to give edgy answers, i suggest you back up your claims and methods of surveying before making fun of your customer.
Or he could have given him a ban for spreading rumours and false accusations with intent to hurt the game, as per forum rules, but he didn’t, so yeah.