Something Something

41387612 · May 10, 2017, 1:33pm

Well, if you don’t own a license for your executable then it will be flagged, BUT I have never heard of an anti-virus calling it a virus. A warning stating it COULD be a virus would be more believable.

34591514 · May 10, 2017, 9:14pm

On 4/5/2017 at 11:31 PM, MightyHoot said:

Got all data in 0:21:29.053654
Players which didn’t change nick: 25919

Done in 0:22:04.941000

![:D](<fileStore.core_Emoticons>/emoticons/006j.png “:D”)

[igns.rar](< base_url >/applications/core/interface/file/attachment.php?id=14194)

This is awesome! Well done!!!

3522870 · May 11, 2017, 2:10pm

proud of da tillo!

now git

21755018 · May 11, 2017, 2:42pm

31 minutes ago, g4borg said:

proud of da tillo!

now git

34591514 · May 11, 2017, 5:53pm

I’m trying to analyze the data, have you the virgin data? (Not formatted)

21755018 · May 11, 2017, 6:24pm

56 minutes ago, ITalianBadBoy said:

I’m trying to analyze the data, have you the virgin data? (Not formatted)

Nope. Just remove “\xa0” from stuff that are called ‘total’ and you’ll get not formatted data ![:D](<fileStore.core_Emoticons>/emoticons/006j.png “:D”)

but you know, [@ITalianBadBoy](< base_url >/index.php?/profile/256224-italianbadboy/) you could download it yourself… You already have function to download data so just put it in loop. All igns I used are in this thread.

21755018 · May 11, 2017, 8:40pm

Raw data from api thingie:

raw.rar

34591514 · May 12, 2017, 7:35am

Thank you for your time :3

41387612 · May 12, 2017, 3:11pm

[@MightyHoot](< base_url >/index.php?/profile/256206-mightyhoot/) Here is another thing you can do with the data you have acquired if you want and I ofc will help. What would be interesting to know is just how unbalanced pvp MM is. You could get the w/l + pilot rating of each person in 1 match and compare them and see just how different the teams are.

My point is that if MM would try to balance more on w/l & Pilot rating then it might be actually balanced for a change. Going into a match where you have nothing but strong opponents on enemy team and then some randoms that rarely even play pvp allied is a dc waiting to happen.

21755018 · May 12, 2017, 3:44pm

28 minutes ago, xXConflictionXx said:

[@MightyHoot](< base_url >/index.php?/profile/256206-mightyhoot/) Here is another thing you can do with the data you have acquired if you want and I ofc will help. What would be interesting to know is just how unbalanced pvp MM is. You could get the w/l + pilot rating of each person in 1 match and compare them and see just how different the teams are.

My point is that if MM would try to balance more on w/l & Pilot rating then it might be actually balanced for a change. Going into a match where you have nothing but strong opponents on enemy team and then some randoms that rarely even play pvp allied is a dc waiting to happen.

Yea… had this idea already but… I have to redo parser 1st. Either make proper one myself or steal from [@g4borg](< base_url >/index.php?/profile/239042-g4borg/) and enhance it ![:D](<fileStore.core_Emoticons>/emoticons/006j.png “:D”)

So it would give this:

and at the bottom would be average player stats and total game stat

I’ll do it one day… Now I have to finish steel and prefabrication projects ![:(](<fileStore.core_Emoticons>/emoticons/003j.png “:(”)

41387612 · May 12, 2017, 3:50pm

VERY NICE! btw just a tip on window screenshots so you don’t have to trim; press ctrl + shift + alt + printscreen while the window you want is active (only captures the active window).

Also let me know if I can help. this is an interesting project and cant wait to see the results ![:D](<fileStore.core_Emoticons>/emoticons/006j.png “:D”)

3522870 · May 12, 2017, 4:01pm

i try to make it py3

21755018 · May 12, 2017, 4:04pm

10 minutes ago, xXConflictionXx said:

VERY NICE! btw just a tip on window screenshots so you don’t have to trim; press ctrl + shift + alt + printscreen while the window you want is active (only captures the active window).

Also let me know if I can help. this is an interesting project and cant wait to see the results ![:D](<fileStore.core_Emoticons>/emoticons/006j.png “:D”)

This is better m8 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Snipping_Tool

I will let you know when I actually get time and will to get back to it ![:D](<fileStore.core_Emoticons>/emoticons/006j.png “:D”)

2165807 · May 12, 2017, 7:01pm

2 hours ago, MightyHoot said:

This is better m8 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Snipping_Tool

I will let you know when I actually get time and will to get back to it ![:D](<fileStore.core_Emoticons>/emoticons/006j.png “:D”)

Nothing beats ShareX https://getsharex.com/

21755018 · May 12, 2017, 7:35pm

33 minutes ago, John161 said:

Nothing beats ShareX https://getsharex.com/

It isn’t preinstalled on system so yeah… https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Snipping_Tool beats it

34591514 · May 14, 2017, 9:57pm

I did a first analysis of the data received :3

The aim of the survey was to reduce the error generated by the huge number of new player’s data.

By analyzing the units of the universe, in the range of “days in battle”,

we can notice that the average time for a battle tends to 07m. 13s. ±09s. when the days increase.

Through an estimate of the median range has been calculated the waste region,

with the probability of 99,73% , for the avg. time in a battle < 06m. 45s. (405343 ms) .

The players with less than 4 days of gaming aren’ t reflecting the universe’s averages.

Then 17903 players are unsuitable and the remaining suitable are 9179.

The players data suitable have been placed in Json format : [PlayersData .rar](< base_url >/applications/core/interface/file/attachment.php?id=14272) (obj.data={}; obj.name=[]

The tool created for made the calculation is: [Analysis.rar](< base_url >/applications/core/interface/file/attachment.php?id=14271)

Spoiler

|

Battle’s Average Time = 07m. 13s.; Variance = ±00m. 09s.;

Zc = 3; ZMin = 06m. 45s.;

Name Found = 27082; Name Not Found = 1882;

Number = 81038; NaN = 4;

Executed in = 145 ms.;

|

Days in battle	Players	FS	Battle	Avg Time in 1 Battle	Is Valid?
x	±s	x	±s	x	±s
—	—	—	—	—	—
0	10579	9	15	76	68
1	3418	22	20	329	75
2	2306	29	22	542	82
3	1600	36	27	752	102
4	1257	41	27	958	102
5	930	49	30	1172	111
6	747	53	31	1374	119
7	594	58	34	1586	142
8	480	63	32	1785	119
9	407	68	40	1978	136
10	350	69	36	2194	150
11	361	75	36	2391	166
12	300	80	40	2574	166
13	271	84	40	2778	188
14	222	83	38	2967	165
15	210	95	40	3187	170
16	178	94	41	3366	191
17	165	97	41	3565	200
18	160	93	41	3751	208
19	153	101	40	3925	226
20	149	104	42	4144	215
21	128	103	39	4327	206
22	107	107	46	4501	208
23	87	101	39	4758	240
24	101	104	42	4929	242
25	97	119	44	5113	230
26	89	109	42	5339	251
27	73	119	40	5519	272
28	75	128	44	5745	381
29	70	126	40	5917	285
30	78	116	45	6066	248
31	69	120	47	6277	253
32	63	131	42	6499	276
33	49	128	38	6654	378
34	54	133	36	6918	336
35	53	129	41	7072	314
36	40	124	36	7291	343
37	61	132	38	7428	288
38	32	140	48	7657	311
39	27	125	46	7867	442
40	49	131	40	8090	273
41	40	139	35	8201	316
42	31	150	31	8475	292
43	39	136	39	8572	360
44	36	141	44	8860	580
45	25	143	38	9011	333
46	40	139	41	9318	443
47	21	134	46	9323	401
48	26	148	39	9732	404
49	28	146	30	9718	325
50	28	143	33	10124	470
51	25	138	41	10205	455
52	24	147	36	10417	323
53	29	130	41	10606	353
54	25	151	42	10802	522
55	15	133	39	11008	389
56	12	146	41	10890	476
57	18	131	31	11468	296
58	19	149	45	11564	458
59	12	152	26	11443	524
60	13	146	37	12068	628
61	15	127	52	12243	450
62	16	160	31	12238	422
63	14	143	34	12670	406
64	12	141	53	12623	391
65	18	139	40	13032	487
66	11	139	41	13041	497
67	13	160	29	13566	788
68	12	164	32	13561	394
69	11	155	17	13546	592
70	8	159	21	13705	366
71	8	163	30	13633	460
72	7	150	70	14134	513
73	7	163	31	14167	677
74	17	129	36	14549	673
75	6	163	26	14916	390
76	6	168	22	15056	448
77	9	144	32	15192	265
78	5	167	28	15297	316
79	8	154	50	16086	651
80	3	142	16	16199	477
81	4	132	24	16143	147
82	9	153	35	16497	901
85	5	157	38	16798	182
86	6	134	46	17285	517
87	6	176	29	17393	519
89	5	145	29	17781	451
93	7	152	49	18355	531
94	4	155	21	19107	1210
96	4	167	12	18922	911
103	3	188	25	21070	826
106	3	168	43	21020	609
115	4	163	17	22152	602
122	3	166	11	23633	523

21755018 · May 16, 2017, 1:26pm

On 14.05.2017 at 11:57 PM, ITalianBadBoy said:

I did a first analysis of the data received :3

The aim of the survey was to reduce the error generated by the huge number of new player’s data.

By analyzing the units of the universe, in the range of “days in battle”,

we can notice that the average time for a battle tends to 07m. 13s. ±09s. when the days increase.

Through an estimate of the median range has been calculated the waste region,

with the probability of 99,73% , for the avg. time in a battle < 06m. 45s. (405343 ms) .

The players with less than 4 days of gaming aren’ t reflecting the universe’s averages.

Then 17903 players are unsuitable and the remaining suitable are 9179.

The players data suitable have been placed in Json format : [PlayersData .rar](< base_url >/applications/core/interface/file/attachment.php?id=14272) (obj.data={}; obj.name=[]

The tool created for made the calculation is: [Analysis.rar](< base_url >/applications/core/interface/file/attachment.php?id=14271)

Reveal hidden contents

|

Battle’s Average Time = 07m. 13s.; Variance = ±00m. 09s.;

Zc = 3; ZMin = 06m. 45s.;

Name Found = 27082; Name Not Found = 1882;

Number = 81038; NaN = 4;

Executed in = 145 ms.;

|

Days in battle Players FS Battle Avg Time in 1 Battle Is Valid?

x ±s x ±s x ±s

— — — — — —

0 10579 9 15 76 68

1 3418 22 20 329 75

2 2306 29 22 542 82

3 1600 36 27 752 102

4 1257 41 27 958 102

5 930 49 30 1172 111

6 747 53 31 1374 119

7 594 58 34 1586 142

8 480 63 32 1785 119

9 407 68 40 1978 136

10 350 69 36 2194 150

11 361 75 36 2391 166

12 300 80 40 2574 166

13 271 84 40 2778 188

14 222 83 38 2967 165

15 210 95 40 3187 170

16 178 94 41 3366 191

17 165 97 41 3565 200

18 160 93 41 3751 208

19 153 101 40 3925 226

20 149 104 42 4144 215

21 128 103 39 4327 206

22 107 107 46 4501 208

23 87 101 39 4758 240

24 101 104 42 4929 242

25 97 119 44 5113 230

26 89 109 42 5339 251

27 73 119 40 5519 272

28 75 128 44 5745 381

29 70 126 40 5917 285

30 78 116 45 6066 248

31 69 120 47 6277 253

32 63 131 42 6499 276

33 49 128 38 6654 378

34 54 133 36 6918 336

35 53 129 41 7072 314

36 40 124 36 7291 343

37 61 132 38 7428 288

38 32 140 48 7657 311

39 27 125 46 7867 442

40 49 131 40 8090 273

41 40 139 35 8201 316

42 31 150 31 8475 292

43 39 136 39 8572 360

44 36 141 44 8860 580

45 25 143 38 9011 333

46 40 139 41 9318 443

47 21 134 46 9323 401

48 26 148 39 9732 404

49 28 146 30 9718 325

50 28 143 33 10124 470

51 25 138 41 10205 455

52 24 147 36 10417 323

53 29 130 41 10606 353

54 25 151 42 10802 522

55 15 133 39 11008 389

56 12 146 41 10890 476

57 18 131 31 11468 296

58 19 149 45 11564 458

59 12 152 26 11443 524

60 13 146 37 12068 628

61 15 127 52 12243 450

62 16 160 31 12238 422

63 14 143 34 12670 406

64 12 141 53 12623 391

65 18 139 40 13032 487

66 11 139 41 13041 497

67 13 160 29 13566 788

68 12 164 32 13561 394

69 11 155 17 13546 592

70 8 159 21 13705 366

71 8 163 30 13633 460

72 7 150 70 14134 513

73 7 163 31 14167 677

74 17 129 36 14549 673

75 6 163 26 14916 390

76 6 168 22 15056 448

77 9 144 32 15192 265

78 5 167 28 15297 316

79 8 154 50 16086 651

80 3 142 16 16199 477

81 4 132 24 16143 147

82 9 153 35 16497 901

85 5 157 38 16798 182

86 6 134 46 17285 517

87 6 176 29 17393 519

89 5 145 29 17781 451

93 7 152 49 18355 531

94 4 155 21 19107 1210

96 4 167 12 18922 911

103 3 188 25 21070 826

106 3 168 43 21020 609

115 4 163 17 22152 602

122 3 166 11 23633 523

That’s nice ![:D](<fileStore.core_Emoticons>/emoticons/006j.png “:D”)

3522870 · May 16, 2017, 2:34pm

why did you save the grepped grabbed data as lies.js?

is there some deeper message!? ![:p](<fileStore.core_Emoticons>/emoticons/004.png “:p”) ![:p](<fileStore.core_Emoticons>/emoticons/004.png “:p”)

21755018 · May 16, 2017, 2:46pm

33 minutes ago, g4borg said:

why did you save the grepped grabbed data as lies.js?

is there some deeper message!? ![:p](<fileStore.core_Emoticons>/emoticons/004.png “:p”) ![:p](<fileStore.core_Emoticons>/emoticons/004.png “:p”)

¯_(ツ)_/¯

a something

from pprint import pprint basic\_parts = ['Metal blank', 'Graphite plate', 'Pure silicon', 'Processing block', 'Computing chip','Screened battery', 'Osmium crystal', 'Neodium plate', 'Enriched beryllium','Enriched electrum', 'Enriched monocrystal', 'Xenocrystal']kek = [0 for x in range(len(basic\_parts))]basic = {key: value for (key, value) in zip(basic\_parts, kek)}parts = {'Deflector package': {'Pure silicon': 18, 'Computing chip': 24, 'Processing block': 6, 'Enriched monocrystal': 20, 'Screened battery': 5},'Internal structures': {'Metal blank': 15, 'Graphite plate': 15, 'Osmium crystal': 15, 'Enriched monocrystal': 25, 'Screened battery': 5},'Reactor package': {'Pure silicon': 21, 'Graphite plate': 24, 'Osmium crystal': 24, 'Enriched monocrystal': 20, 'Computing chip': 15},'Exterior structures': {'Metal blank': 12, 'Graphite plate': 18, 'Screened battery': 6, 'Enriched monocrystal': 18, 'Osmium crystal': 15},'Engine package': {'Metal blank': 12, 'Computing chip': 18, 'Screened battery': 9, 'Enriched monocrystal': 22, 'Processing block': 5},'Computing system': {'Pure silicon': 30, 'Computing chip': 30, 'Processing block': 3, 'Enriched monocrystal': 22, 'Osmium crystal': 15}}ships = {'Cyning': {'Engine package':6,'Reactor package':1,'Deflector package':0,'Exterior structures':5,'Computing system':6,'Internal structures':2},'Mjolnir': {'Engine package':3,'Reactor package':2,'Deflector package':1,'Exterior structures':9,'Computing system':3,'Internal structures':3},'Kraken': {'Engine package':1,'Reactor package':3,'Deflector package':1,'Exterior structures':9,'Computing system':3,'Internal structures':5},'Peregrine': {'Engine package':7,'Reactor package':1,'Deflector package':2,'Exterior structures':1,'Computing system':9,'Internal structures':2},'Jaguar': {'Engine package':6,'Reactor package':5,'Deflector package':3,'Exterior structures':2,'Computing system':1,'Internal structures':3},'Octopus': {'Engine package':6,'Reactor package':6,'Deflector package':3,'Exterior structures':0,'Computing system':1,'Internal structures':5},'Caltrop': {'Engine package':4,'Reactor package':1,'Deflector package':7,'Exterior structures':0,'Computing system':7,'Internal structures':2},'Saw One': {'Engine package':1,'Reactor package':9,'Deflector package':6,'Exterior structures':0,'Computing system':3,'Internal structures':3},'Ronin': {'Engine package':3,'Reactor package':3,'Deflector package':6,'Exterior structures':0,'Computing system':3,'Internal structures':5}}required = {}for ship in ships.keys(): required[ship] = {} need = required[ship] ship = ships[ship]for pack in ship.keys(): materials = parts[pack]for part in materials.keys():try: need[part] += materials[part]\*ship[pack]except KeyError: need[part] = materials[part]\*ship[pack]continuehave = {'Computing chip': 1545,'Enriched monocrystal': 10,'Graphite plate': 1395,'Metal blank': 2120,'Osmium crystal': 1305,'Processing block': 562,'Pure silicon': 2487,'Screened battery': 1290}have2 = {'Deflector package': 0,'Internal structures': 3,'Reactor package': 0,'Exterior structures': 2,'Engine package': 2,'Computing system': 1} kek = [x for x in range(1, len(ships.keys())+1)]lel = {key: value for (key, value) in zip(kek, ships.keys())}print('Do you have ship parts? [y/n]')answer = input('\> ')if answer == 'y':for part in have2: answer = input(f'{part}: ') have2[part] = int(answer)print('Do you have parts? [y/n]')answer = input('\> ')if answer == 'y':for part in have: answer = input(f'{part}: ') have[part] = int(answer)print('Choose which ships you want to calulate:')for key in lel.keys():print(f'{key}: {lel[key]}')answer = input('\> ')answer = answer.split(',')ship\_needs = {}for ship in answer:#for ship in range(1,10): part\_need = ships[lel[int(ship)]] ship\_need = ship\_needs for part in part\_need:try: ship\_need[part] += part\_need[part]except KeyError: ship\_need[part] = part\_need[part]for part in ship\_needs: total = ship\_needs[part] - have2[part]if total \> 0: ship\_needs[part] = total else: ship\_needs[part] = 0pprint(ship\_needs) #partsship\_craft = {}for part in ship\_needs:for element in parts[part]:try: ship\_craft[element] += ship\_needs[part]\*parts[part][element]except KeyError: ship\_craft[element] = ship\_needs[part]\*parts[part][element]pprint(ship\_craft) #materials

41387612 · May 16, 2017, 3:14pm

Before you guys know it, you will have recreated the entire Star Conflict game in Python. lmao